Damir Dzumhur vs Johan Nikles — Sibiu CH Round of 16

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Damir Dzumhur
BIH6
Damir Dzumhur
#108ATP
1638ELO
1594Clay ELO
$528kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
clay
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#411ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Dzumhur D.
6-4 6-3
Nikles J.
Dzumhur D.
662
Nikles J.
430

Damir Dzumhur defeated Johan Nikles 6-4 6-3 in the Sibiu CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Damir Dzumhur came in ranked #108, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Damir Dzumhur closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dzumhur D.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Nikles J.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Dzumhur D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Dzumhur D.Nikles J.
0
Serve
—
58
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Dzumhur D.Nikles J.
1st serve in·Even
67%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
55%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Even
58%
55%
Aces / match·Even
1.1
1.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 74). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dzumhur D.Nikles J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
7
Break points saved·Dominant
87
22
Break points won·Dominant
64
30
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
29
Tiebreaks·
70
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dzumhur D.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Nikles J.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.0+288 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.0Clay Elo 1306
9.1Overall Elo 1638
ELO gap
0.9Overall Elo 1319
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.2
Surface form
2.4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Dzumhur D.Nikles J.
Freshness·
76
—

Dzumhur D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[6]
Ionel N.
0-67-666-3
Fatic N.
Coria F.[1]
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Ionel N.
Misolic F.[2]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Klein L.
7-696-1
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
6-46-0
Coria F.[1]
Valkusz M.
3-0
R16
Ionel N.
Jianu F.
3-66-42-0
Misolic F.[2]
Molleker R.
6-33-66-3
Fatic N.
Wessels L.
6-37-64
Gakhov I.
Fonio G.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Diez S.
7-646-4
Valkusz M.
Milojevic N.[8]
6-16-2
Klein L.
Kolar Z.[3]
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Nikles J.
6-46-3
R32
Valkusz M.
Copil M.
7-637-64
Misolic F.[2]
Choinski J.
6-33-66-2
Molleker R.
Harris B.
6-46-2
Klein L.
Cornea V.
6-27-5
Fatic N.
Bonadio R.[5]
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
Fonio G.
Madaras D.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[8]
Van Assche L.
7-51-66-2
Diez S.
Basic M.
6-16-3
Jianu F.
Kravchenko G.
2-66-17-63
Gakhov I.
Tirante T.[4]
6-757-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Ramanathan R.
6-26-1
Ionel N.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-36-1
Nikles J.
Wehnelt K.
6-47-5
Dzumhur D.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[3]
Dima D.
6-26-3