Daniel Evans vs Taro Daniel — San Diego Round of 16

San Diego · ATP · Round of 16
Daniel Evans
GBR1
Daniel Evans
#385ATP
1588ELO
1562Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
Taro Daniel
JPN
Taro Daniel
#203ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
Evans D.
6-4 6-4
Daniel T.
Evans D.
662
Daniel T.
440

Daniel Evans defeated Taro Daniel 6-4 6-4 in the San Diego round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniel Evans came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 16. Daniel Evans extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Evans edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-14AlmatyR32hardDaniel Evans6-2 7-6(4)
2013-12-30DohaQ3hardDaniel Evans6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Evans D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Evans D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Evans D.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Evans D.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
73
42
Break points saved·Even
97
93
Break points won·Clear edge
61
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
16
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Evans D.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Daniel T.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
6.2+50 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1512
6.4Overall Elo 1588
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1567
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
4.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Evans D.Daniel T.
Freshness·Dominant
100
72

Evans D.: 18 days rest · Daniel T.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.[5]
Giron M.[3]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Giron M.[3]
Evans D.[1]
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Oconnell C.
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Evans D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Galan D.
6-34-66-4
Oconnell C.
Brooksby J.[2]
6-44-67-5
Giron M.[3]
Duckworth J.[7]
7-656-3
R16
Evans D.[1]
Daniel T.
6-46-4
Nakashima B.[5]
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Galan D.
Martinez P.[4]
5-76-16-4
Brooksby J.[2]
Mcdonald M.
6-43-66-2
Lestienne C.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-16-3
Giron M.[3]
Etcheverry T.
6-46-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Krueger M.
6-37-64
Oconnell C.
Wolf J.[8]
6-37-5
R32
Oconnell C.
Kubler J.
4-66-30-0
Lestienne C.
Holt B.
5-77-656-3
Etcheverry T.
Mena F.
7-666-3
Duckworth J.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-54-66-1
Kudla D.
Verdasco F.
6-36-3
Galan D.
Huesler M.
6-37-5
Nakashima B.[5]
Svajda Z.
7-57-65
Mcdonald M.
Laaksonen H.
6-06-2
Daniel T.
Nava E.
6-46-3
Krueger M.
Eubanks C.
6-46-4
Wolf J.[8]
Kozlov S.
6-27-66
Tabilo A.[6]
Johnson S.
7-56-2