Filip Misolic vs Jan Choinski — Sibiu CH Round of 32

Sibiu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Filip Misolic
AUT2
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
clay
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Misolic F.
6-3 3-6 6-2
Choinski J.
Misolic F.
6362
Choinski J.
3621

Filip Misolic defeated Jan Choinski 6-3 3-6 6-2 in the Sibiu CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jan Choinski came in ranked #75.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Misolic closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Choinski J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Choinski J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Choinski J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
79
55
Break points saved·Even
91
90
Break points won·Dominant
53
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Choinski J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+12 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Clay Elo 1652
5.0Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1686
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
6.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
3.5
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Misolic F.Choinski J.
Freshness·
—
55

Choinski J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fatic N.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[6]
Ionel N.
0-67-666-3
Fatic N.
Coria F.[1]
4-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Ionel N.
Misolic F.[2]
6-26-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Klein L.
7-696-1
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
6-46-0
Coria F.[1]
Valkusz M.
3-0
R16
Ionel N.
Jianu F.
3-66-42-0
Misolic F.[2]
Molleker R.
6-33-66-3
Fatic N.
Wessels L.
6-37-64
Gakhov I.
Fonio G.
6-46-2
Coria F.[1]
Diez S.
7-646-4
Valkusz M.
Milojevic N.[8]
6-16-2
Klein L.
Kolar Z.[3]
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[6]
Nikles J.
6-46-3
R32
Valkusz M.
Copil M.
7-637-64
Misolic F.[2]
Choinski J.
6-33-66-2
Molleker R.
Harris B.
6-46-2
Klein L.
Cornea V.
6-27-5
Fatic N.
Bonadio R.[5]
6-36-3
Wessels L.
Bellucci M.
4-66-36-4
Fonio G.
Madaras D.
6-16-4
Milojevic N.[8]
Van Assche L.
7-51-66-2
Diez S.
Basic M.
6-16-3
Jianu F.
Kravchenko G.
2-66-17-63
Gakhov I.
Tirante T.[4]
6-757-56-1
Coria F.[1]
Ramanathan R.
6-26-1
Ionel N.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-36-1
Nikles J.
Wehnelt K.
6-47-5
Dzumhur D.[6]
Horansky F.
6-36-2
Kolar Z.[3]
Dima D.
6-26-3