Emilio Gomez vs Nick Chappell — Columbus CH Quarter-final

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ECU2
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Gomez E.
6-3 6-1
Chappell N.
Gomez E.
662
Chappell N.
310

Emilio Gomez defeated Nick Chappell 6-3 6-1 in the Columbus CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nick Chappell came in defending last year's round of 32, but Emilio Gomez had arrived on a 3-match winning run.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
0
Break points saved·Dominant
77
29
Break points won·Slight edge
19
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
23
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.9
Surface form
4.7
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nishioka Y.[3]
Stricker D.
6-26-4
Thompson J.[1]
Gomez E.[2]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-36-4
Stricker D.
Rodionov J.[4]
6-42-66-4
Thompson J.[1]
Kingsley C.
7-666-3
Gomez E.[2]
Hijikata R.[8]
3-66-36-0
Quarter-finals
Nishioka Y.[3]
Gomez E.[6]
6-14-66-3
Brooksby J.[1]
Escobedo E.[5]
6-41-66-1
Stricker D.
Sock J.[7]
W/O
Rodionov J.[4]
Torpegaard M.
6-717-54-3
Hijikata R.[8]
Stricker D.[3]
4-67-676-3
Kingsley C.
Vukic A.[4]
6-36-2
Thompson J.[1]
Diallo G.
6-26-1
Gomez E.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
R16
Nishioka Y.[3]
Wolf J.
6-22-66-4
Stricker D.
Kozlov S.
4-66-46-3
Torpegaard M.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-16-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Blanch U.
7-686-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Istomin D.
7-56-1
Sock J.[7]
Soeda G.
6-36-4
Rodionov J.[4]
Hardt N.
6-36-2
Gomez E.[6]
Kuhn N.
7-667-5
Gomez E.[2]
Sandgren T.
3-66-36-2
Stricker D.[3]
Lock B.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[8]
Boulais J.
6-46-4
Kingsley C.
Jubb P.[7]
7-646-4
Diallo G.
Mchugh A.
7-56-767-5
Thompson J.[1]
Mukund S.
6-36-3
Chappell N.
Couacaud E.[5]
6-46-716-4
Vukic A.[4]
Nakagawa N.
7-53-67-62
R32
Kozlov S.
Bernard A.
6-26-1
Soeda G.
Wu T.
7-656-2
Rodionov J.[4]
Schnur B.
6-45-77-5
Hardt N.
Harrison R.
6-47-63
Torpegaard M.
Mmoh M.
6-47-63
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-2
Gomez E.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
7-57-5
Kuhn N.
Uchiyama Y.
7-666-4
Escobedo E.[5]
Jung J.
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
7-676-4
Istomin D.
Fanselow S.
7-51-66-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Krueger M.
2-66-37-5
Wolf J.
Anthrop J.
6-06-3
Sock J.[7]
Eubanks C.
7-676-746-4
Nishioka Y.[3]
Watanuki Y.
6-46-4
Stricker D.
Sandgren T.[2]
6-46-737-60
Gomez E.[2]
Cash R.
6-36-2
Chappell N.
Galarneau A.
1-66-16-3
Stricker D.[3]
Kypson P.
6-26-4
Boulais J.
Tracy J.
7-57-64
Hijikata R.[8]
Ponwith N.
6-16-4
Jubb P.[7]
Harrison R.
7-666-4
Nakagawa N.
Clark E.
7-56-2
Diallo G.
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-3
Couacaud E.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-37-5
Kingsley C.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Lock B.
Zhu E.
3-66-17-67
Sandgren T.
Kumar O.
7-56-2
Vukic A.[4]
Cox D.
6-46-2
Thompson J.[1]
Broom C.
7-656-2
Mchugh A.
Koepfer D.[6]
3-67-647-67