Nathan Ponwith vs Jack Anthrop — Columbus CH Qualifying Round 2
Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 September 2022
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited- Extended break: 238 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
2.9
Surface form0.0
Win streak0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d9.0
Prev. matchContext
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Ponwith N.
3662
Anthrop J.
6441
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form59%1st serve in+8%67%
63%1st serve points won+9%72%
54%2nd serve points won+1%53%
59%Service points won+7%66%
35%Return points won35%
56%Break points saved+16%72%
2.2Aces / match+0.52.7
2.6Double faults / match+1.31.3
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (14 vs 3). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw — qualifying
Q2
Mejia N.
Galarneau A.
3-67-667-65
Fanselow S.[8]
Polansky P.[4]
6-36-3
Quiroz R.
Kamke T.[1]
6-747-666-1
Watanuki Y.[3]
Rybakov A.[10]
7-647-66
Hardt N.[9]
Nava E.[6]
6-24-66-0
Harrison R.
Young D.
3-66-16-3
Cash R.
Glinka D.[12]
3-67-676-4
Nakagawa N.[1]
Smith R.[8]
3-66-36-4
Kypson P.[7]
Young D.[6]
4-66-06-4
Trotter J.
Kirchheimer S.[2]
6-26-0
Ponwith N.[3]
Anthrop J.
3-66-46-4
Q1
Quiroz R.
Harrison C.[7]
6-47-65
Fanselow S.[8]
Svajda Z.
2-66-46-4
Galarneau A.
Kovacevic A.[11]
6-14-67-63
Nava E.[6]
Cozbinov A.
3-66-27-65
Polansky P.[4]
Aragone J.
6-36-3
Harrison R.
Pervolarakis M.[12]
7-56-1
Kamke T.[1]
Smith K.
6-46-1
Young D.
Uchida K.[2]
6-37-67
Rybakov A.[10]
Nanda G.
5-76-26-4
Mejia N.
Chappell N.
7-52-66-1
Kypson P.[7]
Saar K.
6-36-3
Glinka D.[12]
Stearns P.
7-56-3
Trotter J.
Frantzen C.
6-06-2
Anthrop J.
Bernard A.[10]
6-37-5
Cash R.
Mcnally J.[5]
6-46-4
Young D.[6]
Brown P.
6-45-77-5