Beibit Zhukayev vs Nicolas Alvarez Varona — Istanbul CH Round of 16

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
ESP8
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
#481ATP
1353ELO
1382Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLL
Zhukayev B.
6-4 6-1
Alvarez Varona N.
Zhukayev B.
662
Alvarez Varona N.
410

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Nicolas Alvarez Varona 6-4 6-1 in the Istanbul CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Alvarez Varona N.

Alvarez Varona N.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Alvarez Varona N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.9
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Alvarez Varona N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
31
5
Break points saved·Dominant
94
40
Break points won·Clear edge
1
17
Deciding sets·Even
25
29
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Alvarez Varona N.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+20 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Hard Elo 1382
6.6Overall Elo 1455
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1353
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
1.7
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
1.2
Minutes 14d
8.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Albot R.[2]
Rosol L.
6-26-0
Semi-finals
Albot R.[2]
Blancaneaux G.[4]
1-66-16-2
Rosol L.
Kirci K.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Albot R.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-24-67-64
Kirci K.
Ofner S.[7]
4-66-36-3
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Rosol L.
Lokoli L.[6]
6-46-4
R16
Zhukayev B.
Alvarez Varona N.[8]
6-46-1
Ofner S.[7]
Marchenko I.
6-17-5
Kirci K.
Verdasco F.[3]
6-46-3
Lokoli L.[6]
Atmane T.
7-655-76-4
Rosol L.
Haase R.
6-36-1
Mayot H.
Giustino L.
7-57-5
Albot R.[2]
Squire H.
6-46-3
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Gray A.
6-746-26-2
R32
Giustino L.
Palan D.
6-26-2
Mayot H.
Jubb P.[5]
6-35-76-0
Marchenko I.
Gengel M.
7-56-4
Verdasco F.[3]
Ilkel B.
6-46-1
Lokoli L.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-2
Atmane T.
Patael B.
6-46-4
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-46-4
Ofner S.[7]
Agabigun S.
6-26-4
Alvarez Varona N.[8]
Setkic A.
6-16-4
Rosol L.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-27-61
Kirci K.
Metreveli A.
6-796-46-2
Zhukayev B.
Aksu C.
6-36-4
Haase R.
Lock B.
6-36-2
Albot R.[2]
Jianu F.
7-666-4
Gray A.
Medjedovic H.
6-46-4
Squire H.
Apostol B.
6-20-0