Clement Tabur vs Marko Topo — Rennes CH Round of 32

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Clement Tabur
FRA
Clement Tabur
#178ATP
1607ELO
1573Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
GER
Marko Topo
#374ATP
1463ELO
1473Hard ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLLLL
Tabur C.
1-6 7-6 6-3
Topo M.
Tabur C.
17762
Topo M.
66531

Clement Tabur defeated Marko Topo 1-6 7-6 6-3 in the Rennes CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Topo M.

Topo M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Topo M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 149). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Topo M.
Clutch Rating·Even
30
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
87
Break points won·Clear edge
23
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
33
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
45
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Topo M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+100 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1473
6.3Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
3.7Overall Elo 1463
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
8.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Topo M.
Freshness·Clear edge
55
79

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 100 games (7d) · Topo M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Humbert U.[4]
Thiem D.
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[4]
Gojowczyk P.[2]
6-36-4
Thiem D.
Gaston H.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Gojowczyk P.[2]
Barrere G.[6]
7-624-67-5
Thiem D.
Andreev A.
3-66-36-2
Humbert U.[4]
Brouwer G.[8]
6-17-65
Gaston H.[1]
Paire B.[7]
6-36-1
R16
Gojowczyk P.[2]
Masur D.
2-66-37-5
Humbert U.[4]
Bellier A.
6-46-1
Thiem D.
Peniston R.[5]
6-36-4
Paire B.[7]
Tabur C.
6-36-3
Gaston H.[1]
Debru G.
6-24-66-3
Barrere G.[6]
Furness E.
7-626-4
Brouwer G.[8]
Chidekh C.
7-53-66-3
Andreev A.
Grenier H.[3]
4-66-37-64
R32
Barrere G.[6]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Brouwer G.[8]
Rehberg M.
6-736-46-4
Peniston R.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-37-65
Thiem D.
Simon G.
4-66-36-2
Paire B.[7]
Added D.
7-634-67-5
Tabur C.
Topo M.
1-67-656-3
Debru G.
Rosenkranz M.
4-66-36-4
Gaston H.[1]
Mertens Y.
7-56-4
Masur D.
De Loore J.
6-796-26-4
Bellier A.
Vatutin A.
6-46-4
Andreev A.
Janvier M.
3-67-657-61
Humbert U.[4]
Friberg K.
6-36-4
Furness E.
Bergevi F.
7-636-2
Gojowczyk P.[2]
De Schepper K.
6-746-36-2
Chidekh C.
Decamps G.
6-25-76-1
Grenier H.[3]
Mora M.
6-26-2