Naoki Nakagawa vs Tyler Zink — Cary CH Qualifying Round 1

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
JPN3
Naoki Nakagawa
#776ATP
1289ELO
1271Hard ELO
29 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
USA
Tyler Zink
#326ATP
1371ELO
1351Hard ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
Nakagawa N.
6-4 6-3
Zink T.
Nakagawa N.
662
Zink T.
430

Naoki Nakagawa defeated Tyler Zink 6-4 6-3 in the Cary CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakagawa N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Zink T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nakagawa N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nakagawa N.Zink T.
1st serve in·Even
55%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
6.0
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (122 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakagawa N.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Zink T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
3.9Hard Elo 1271
Surface ELO
6.1+80 Hard Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1289
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1371
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakagawa N.Zink T.
Freshness·
—
85

Zink T.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Glinka D.
Mayo A.[6]
6-36-2
Johns G.
Ponwith N.[5]
6-37-62
Harrison R.[8]
Clark E.[2]
6-27-68
Kingsley C.[7]
Kirchheimer S.[4]
6-36-2
Young D.[11]
Nakagawa N.[3]
7-56-2
Patten H.[1]
Trotter J.
6-36-4
Q1
Ponwith N.[5]
Krug J.
6-06-2
Kirchheimer S.[4]
Zhang A.
6-737-57-65
Johns G.
Mcnally J.[10]
4-67-656-2
Glinka D.
Smith R.[12]
6-16-4
Patten H.[1]
Mitsui S.
4-66-36-3
Nakagawa N.[3]
Zink T.
6-46-3
Mayo A.[6]
Riffice S.
4-67-56-3
Clark E.[2]
Kiger M.
6-36-2
Kingsley C.[7]
Cash J.
7-636-3
Trotter J.
Kypson P.[9]
7-656-746-3
Young D.[11]
Nava E.
6-26-3
Harrison R.[8]
Rodenas P.
6-36-4