Denis Kudla vs Emilio Nava — Cary CH Round of 16

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA1
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Kudla D.
6-7 6-1 6-3
Nava E.
Kudla D.
64662
Nava E.
77131

Denis Kudla defeated Emilio Nava 6-7 6-1 6-3 in the Cary CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-03-04Indian Wells MastersQ2hardDenis Kudla6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kudla D.Nava E.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Even
50
52
Break points saved·Even
90
94
Break points won·Even
19
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
89
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
30
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nava E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
6.1
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kudla D.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.[7]
Koepfer D.[8]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.[7]
Thompson J.[2]
6-36-2
Koepfer D.[8]
Kudla D.[1]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Koepfer D.[8]
Sandgren T.
6-46-2
Kudla D.[1]
Mena F.[5]
6-36-1
Thompson J.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-33-66-3
R16
Mmoh M.[7]
Rybakov A.
W/O
Uchiyama Y.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-42-0
Chappell N.
Harrison R.
6-44-66-2
Sandgren T.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-636-3
Kudla D.[1]
Nava E.
6-746-16-3
Koepfer D.[8]
Smith K.
1-66-36-2
Thompson J.[2]
Shang J.
7-646-7106-2
Mena F.[5]
Nanda G.
6-36-3
R32
Harrison R.
Vukic A.[6]
7-647-63
Smith K.
Krueger M.
6-37-62
Thompson J.[2]
Seggerman R.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Cox D.
6-06-3
Sandgren T.
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Mena F.[5]
Crawford O.
7-646-2
Nanda G.
Hijikata R.
6-26-3
Nava E.
Johns G.
6-16-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Damm M.
6-37-64
Chappell N.
Glinka D.
6-27-63
Uchiyama Y.
Young D.
4-66-36-0
Kozlov S.[3]
Kingsley C.
2-66-26-2
Kudla D.[1]
Svajda Z.
0-66-26-2
Shang J.
Patten H.
7-57-68
Koepfer D.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4