Dominik Koepfer vs Tennys Sandgren — Cary CH Quarter-final

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GER8
Dominik Koepfer
#1085ATP
32 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Koepfer D.
6-4 6-2
Sandgren T.
Koepfer D.
662
Sandgren T.
420

Dominik Koepfer defeated Tennys Sandgren 6-4 6-2 in the Cary CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Dominik Koepfer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Dominik Koepfer extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-08-20Winston-SalemR32hardDominik Koepfer6-2 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Koepfer D.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Koepfer D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Koepfer D.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
8.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Koepfer D.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
36
Break points saved·Even
94
92
Break points won·Dominant
28
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
28
Tiebreaks·Even
87
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Koepfer D.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Sandgren T.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
4.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.[7]
Koepfer D.[8]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.[7]
Thompson J.[2]
6-36-2
Koepfer D.[8]
Kudla D.[1]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Koepfer D.[8]
Sandgren T.
6-46-2
Kudla D.[1]
Mena F.[5]
6-36-1
Thompson J.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-33-66-3
R16
Mmoh M.[7]
Rybakov A.
W/O
Uchiyama Y.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-42-0
Chappell N.
Harrison R.
6-44-66-2
Sandgren T.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-636-3
Kudla D.[1]
Nava E.
6-746-16-3
Koepfer D.[8]
Smith K.
1-66-36-2
Thompson J.[2]
Shang J.
7-646-7106-2
Mena F.[5]
Nanda G.
6-36-3
R32
Harrison R.
Vukic A.[6]
7-647-63
Smith K.
Krueger M.
6-37-62
Thompson J.[2]
Seggerman R.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Cox D.
6-06-3
Sandgren T.
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Mena F.[5]
Crawford O.
7-646-2
Nanda G.
Hijikata R.
6-26-3
Nava E.
Johns G.
6-16-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Damm M.
6-37-64
Chappell N.
Glinka D.
6-27-63
Uchiyama Y.
Young D.
4-66-36-0
Kozlov S.[3]
Kingsley C.
2-66-26-2
Kudla D.[1]
Svajda Z.
0-66-26-2
Shang J.
Patten H.
7-57-68
Koepfer D.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4