Emilio Nava vs Garrett Johns — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
Garrett Johns
USA
Garrett Johns
#382ATP
1336ELO
1323Hard ELO
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Nava E.
6-1 6-4
Johns G.
Nava E.
662
Johns G.
140

Emilio Nava defeated Garrett Johns 6-1 6-4 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Johns G.

Johns G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Johns G.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Johns G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Johns G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
52
36
Break points saved·Dominant
94
66
Break points won·Clear edge
17
3
Deciding sets·Even
89
90
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Johns G.
2.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 364 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
8.7+298 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Hard Elo 1323
9.5Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1336
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Johns G.
Freshness·Dominant
100
72

Nava E.: 15 days rest · Johns G.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 76 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.[7]
Koepfer D.[8]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.[7]
Thompson J.[2]
6-36-2
Koepfer D.[8]
Kudla D.[1]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Koepfer D.[8]
Sandgren T.
6-46-2
Kudla D.[1]
Mena F.[5]
6-36-1
Thompson J.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-33-66-3
R16
Mmoh M.[7]
Rybakov A.
W/O
Uchiyama Y.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-42-0
Chappell N.
Harrison R.
6-44-66-2
Sandgren T.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-636-3
Kudla D.[1]
Nava E.
6-746-16-3
Koepfer D.[8]
Smith K.
1-66-36-2
Thompson J.[2]
Shang J.
7-646-7106-2
Mena F.[5]
Nanda G.
6-36-3
R32
Harrison R.
Vukic A.[6]
7-647-63
Smith K.
Krueger M.
6-37-62
Thompson J.[2]
Seggerman R.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Cox D.
6-06-3
Sandgren T.
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Mena F.[5]
Crawford O.
7-646-2
Nanda G.
Hijikata R.
6-26-3
Nava E.
Johns G.
6-16-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Damm M.
6-37-64
Chappell N.
Glinka D.
6-27-63
Uchiyama Y.
Young D.
4-66-36-0
Kozlov S.[3]
Kingsley C.
2-66-26-2
Kudla D.[1]
Svajda Z.
0-66-26-2
Shang J.
Patten H.
7-57-68
Koepfer D.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4