Lukas Rosol vs Robin Haase — Istanbul CH Round of 16

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
NED
Robin Haase
39 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Rosol L.
6-3 6-1
Haase R.
Rosol L.
662
Haase R.
310

Lukas Rosol defeated Robin Haase 6-3 6-1 in the Istanbul CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Lukas Rosol came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Lukas Rosol extended the head-to-head to 6–2.

Key context

Head to head

5–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-02-01Davis Cup QLS R1: CZE vs NEDRRhardRobin Haase6-2 6-4
2017-09-15Davis Cup WG PO: CZE vs NEDRRclayLukas Rosol6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 3-6 7-5
2016-02-01SofiaR32hardLukas Rosol3-6 6-3 6-4
2015-03-12Indian Wells MastersR32hardLukas Rosol6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(3)
2014-04-21BucharestSFclayLukas Rosol3-6 6-3 6-2
2013-08-18Winston-SalemR32hardRobin Haase6-4 3-6 7-5
2012-07-09StuttgartR32grassLukas Rosol6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Haase R.

Haase R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Haase R.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (75 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Haase R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
33
Break points saved·Even
89
91
Break points won·Clear edge
3
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
78
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rosol L.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Haase R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Albot R.[2]
Rosol L.
6-26-0
Semi-finals
Albot R.[2]
Blancaneaux G.[4]
1-66-16-2
Rosol L.
Kirci K.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Albot R.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-24-67-64
Kirci K.
Ofner S.[7]
4-66-36-3
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Rosol L.
Lokoli L.[6]
6-46-4
R16
Zhukayev B.
Alvarez Varona N.[8]
6-46-1
Ofner S.[7]
Marchenko I.
6-17-5
Kirci K.
Verdasco F.[3]
6-46-3
Lokoli L.[6]
Atmane T.
7-655-76-4
Rosol L.
Haase R.
6-36-1
Mayot H.
Giustino L.
7-57-5
Albot R.[2]
Squire H.
6-46-3
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Gray A.
6-746-26-2
R32
Giustino L.
Palan D.
6-26-2
Mayot H.
Jubb P.[5]
6-35-76-0
Marchenko I.
Gengel M.
7-56-4
Verdasco F.[3]
Ilkel B.
6-46-1
Lokoli L.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-2
Atmane T.
Patael B.
6-46-4
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-46-4
Ofner S.[7]
Agabigun S.
6-26-4
Alvarez Varona N.[8]
Setkic A.
6-16-4
Rosol L.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-27-61
Kirci K.
Metreveli A.
6-796-46-2
Zhukayev B.
Aksu C.
6-36-4
Haase R.
Lock B.
6-36-2
Albot R.[2]
Jianu F.
7-666-4
Gray A.
Medjedovic H.
6-46-4
Squire H.
Apostol B.
6-20-0