Illya Marchenko vs Marek Gengel — Istanbul CH Round of 32

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
UKR
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#370ATP
1411ELO
1377Hard ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Marchenko I.
7-5 6-4
Gengel M.
Marchenko I.
762
Gengel M.
540

Illya Marchenko defeated Marek Gengel 7-5 6-4 in the Istanbul CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marchenko I.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marchenko I.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Even
5.5
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (140 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marchenko I.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Even
13
11
Break points saved·Dominant
80
35
Break points won·Even
7
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
53
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
10
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marchenko I.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gengel M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
5.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
6.2
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Albot R.[2]
Rosol L.
6-26-0
Semi-finals
Albot R.[2]
Blancaneaux G.[4]
1-66-16-2
Rosol L.
Kirci K.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Albot R.[2]
Zhukayev B.
6-24-67-64
Kirci K.
Ofner S.[7]
4-66-36-3
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Rosol L.
Lokoli L.[6]
6-46-4
R16
Zhukayev B.
Alvarez Varona N.[8]
6-46-1
Ofner S.[7]
Marchenko I.
6-17-5
Kirci K.
Verdasco F.[3]
6-46-3
Lokoli L.[6]
Atmane T.
7-655-76-4
Rosol L.
Haase R.
6-36-1
Mayot H.
Giustino L.
7-57-5
Albot R.[2]
Squire H.
6-46-3
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Gray A.
6-746-26-2
R32
Giustino L.
Palan D.
6-26-2
Mayot H.
Jubb P.[5]
6-35-76-0
Marchenko I.
Gengel M.
7-56-4
Verdasco F.[3]
Ilkel B.
6-46-1
Lokoli L.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-2
Atmane T.
Patael B.
6-46-4
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-46-4
Ofner S.[7]
Agabigun S.
6-26-4
Alvarez Varona N.[8]
Setkic A.
6-16-4
Rosol L.
Duckworth J.[1]
6-27-61
Kirci K.
Metreveli A.
6-796-46-2
Zhukayev B.
Aksu C.
6-36-4
Haase R.
Lock B.
6-36-2
Albot R.[2]
Jianu F.
7-666-4
Gray A.
Medjedovic H.
6-46-4
Squire H.
Apostol B.
6-20-0