Kaja Juvan vs Alize Cornet — Portoroz Round of 32

Portoroz · WTA · Round of 32
Kaja Juvan
SLO
Kaja Juvan
#140WTA
1696ELO
1637Hard ELO
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
FRA6
Alize Cornet
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Juvan K.
7-6 6-3
Cornet A.
Juvan K.
7762
Cornet A.
6530

Kaja Juvan defeated Alize Cornet 7-6 6-3 in the Portoroz round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Kaja Juvan came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Kaja Juvan closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Juvan K.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Cornet A.

Cornet A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Juvan K.

Serve advantage — Juvan K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Juvan K.Cornet A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
44%
Service points won·Even
58%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
4.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Juvan K.Cornet A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
53
Break points saved·Even
56
57
Break points won·Clear edge
95
83
Deciding sets·Slight edge
83
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
33
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Juvan K.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cornet A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Siniakova K.
Rybakina E.[3]
6-747-656-4
Semi-finals
Rybakina E.[3]
Bogdan A.
6-16-1
Siniakova K.
Friedsam A.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Rybakina E.[3]
Tsurenko L.
W/O
Siniakova K.
Paolini J.
6-23-67-65
Bogdan A.
Haddad Maia B.[2]
6-11-67-5
Friedsam A.
Parry D.
1-67-646-3
R16
Bogdan A.
Zidansek T.
6-16-756-1
Tsurenko L.
Alexandrova E.[5]
7-57-65
Paolini J.
Juvan K.
5-76-27-65
Friedsam A.
Raducanu E.[1]
7-50-66-3
Parry D.
Potapova A.[9]
7-626-4
Rybakina E.[3]
Martincova T.
6-46-1
Siniakova K.
Burrage J.
7-56-1
Haddad Maia B.[2]
Bucsa C.
6-16-4
R32
Raducanu E.[1]
Yastremska D.
6-25-3
Siniakova K.
Trevisan M.[4]
6-16-4
Alexandrova E.[5]
Kostyuk M.
7-655-77-5
Burrage J.
Krunic A.
6-46-4
Bucsa C.
Marcinko P.
2-66-46-1
Rybakina E.[3]
Siegemund L.
6-746-47-68
Tsurenko L.
Ruse E.
6-14-66-4
Haddad Maia B.[2]
Tauson C.
7-636-3
Friedsam A.
Mandlik E.
0-66-46-1
Parry D.
Vekic D.
2-66-46-1
Potapova A.[9]
Liu C.
6-47-65
Paolini J.
Wurth T.
7-56-1
Martincova T.
Dart H.
0-66-46-1
Bogdan A.
Tomljanovic A.[8]
7-54-66-1
Zidansek T.
Zakharova A.
6-46-4
Juvan K.
Cornet A.[6]
7-656-3