Jordan Thompson vs Nick Chappell — Cary CH Quarter-final

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jordan Thompson
AUS2
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Thompson J.
6-3 6-1
Chappell N.
Thompson J.
662
Chappell N.
310

Jordan Thompson defeated Nick Chappell 6-3 6-1 in the Cary CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve advantage — Thompson J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
0
Break points saved·Dominant
97
29
Break points won·Clear edge
24
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
3.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Mmoh M.[7]
Koepfer D.[8]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Mmoh M.[7]
Thompson J.[2]
6-36-2
Koepfer D.[8]
Kudla D.[1]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Koepfer D.[8]
Sandgren T.
6-46-2
Kudla D.[1]
Mena F.[5]
6-36-1
Thompson J.[2]
Chappell N.
6-36-1
Mmoh M.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
6-33-66-3
R16
Mmoh M.[7]
Rybakov A.
W/O
Uchiyama Y.
Kozlov S.[3]
6-42-0
Chappell N.
Harrison R.
6-44-66-2
Sandgren T.
Ficovich J.[4]
7-636-3
Kudla D.[1]
Nava E.
6-746-16-3
Koepfer D.[8]
Smith K.
1-66-36-2
Thompson J.[2]
Shang J.
7-646-7106-2
Mena F.[5]
Nanda G.
6-36-3
R32
Harrison R.
Vukic A.[6]
7-647-63
Smith K.
Krueger M.
6-37-62
Thompson J.[2]
Seggerman R.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Cox D.
6-06-3
Sandgren T.
Mchugh A.
6-46-2
Mena F.[5]
Crawford O.
7-646-2
Nanda G.
Hijikata R.
6-26-3
Nava E.
Johns G.
6-16-4
Ficovich J.[4]
Damm M.
6-37-64
Chappell N.
Glinka D.
6-27-63
Uchiyama Y.
Young D.
4-66-36-0
Kozlov S.[3]
Kingsley C.
2-66-26-2
Kudla D.[1]
Svajda Z.
0-66-26-2
Shang J.
Patten H.
7-57-68
Koepfer D.[8]
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4