Gijs Brouwer vs Clement Chidekh — Rennes CH Round of 16

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Gijs Brouwer
NED8
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 September 2022
hard
FRA
Clement Chidekh
#207ATP
1513ELO
1523Hard ELO
$92kYTD
$401kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLW
Brouwer G.
7-5 3-6 6-3
Chidekh C.
Brouwer G.
7362
Chidekh C.
5631

Gijs Brouwer defeated Clement Chidekh 7-5 3-6 6-3 in the Rennes CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Clement Chidekh came in ranked #207, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Gijs Brouwer closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brouwer G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Chidekh C.

Chidekh C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brouwer G.Chidekh C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brouwer G.Chidekh C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
19
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
83
Break points won·Even
6
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
22
59
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
3
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brouwer G.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Chidekh C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.1
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brouwer G.Chidekh C.
Freshness·Dominant
92
66

Brouwer G.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d) · Chidekh C.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Humbert U.[4]
Thiem D.
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[4]
Gojowczyk P.[2]
6-36-4
Thiem D.
Gaston H.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Gojowczyk P.[2]
Barrere G.[6]
7-624-67-5
Thiem D.
Andreev A.
3-66-36-2
Humbert U.[4]
Brouwer G.[8]
6-17-65
Gaston H.[1]
Paire B.[7]
6-36-1
R16
Gojowczyk P.[2]
Masur D.
2-66-37-5
Humbert U.[4]
Bellier A.
6-46-1
Thiem D.
Peniston R.[5]
6-36-4
Paire B.[7]
Tabur C.
6-36-3
Gaston H.[1]
Debru G.
6-24-66-3
Barrere G.[6]
Furness E.
7-626-4
Brouwer G.[8]
Chidekh C.
7-53-66-3
Andreev A.
Grenier H.[3]
4-66-37-64
R32
Barrere G.[6]
Moriya H.
6-36-2
Brouwer G.[8]
Rehberg M.
6-736-46-4
Peniston R.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-37-65
Thiem D.
Simon G.
4-66-36-2
Paire B.[7]
Added D.
7-634-67-5
Tabur C.
Topo M.
1-67-656-3
Debru G.
Rosenkranz M.
4-66-36-4
Gaston H.[1]
Mertens Y.
7-56-4
Masur D.
De Loore J.
6-796-26-4
Bellier A.
Vatutin A.
6-46-4
Andreev A.
Janvier M.
3-67-657-61
Humbert U.[4]
Friberg K.
6-36-4
Furness E.
Bergevi F.
7-636-2
Gojowczyk P.[2]
De Schepper K.
6-746-36-2
Chidekh C.
Decamps G.
6-25-76-1
Grenier H.[3]
Mora M.
6-26-2