Lucas Miedler vs Filip Misolic — Tulln CH Round of 32

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUT
Lucas Miedler
#1536ATP
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2022
clay
Filip Misolic
AUT7
Filip Misolic
#221ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Miedler L.
6-4 7-6
Misolic F.
Miedler L.
6782
Misolic F.
4660

Lucas Miedler defeated Filip Misolic 6-4 7-6 in the Tulln CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Filip Misolic came in ranked #221, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Miedler L.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Misolic F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Miedler L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Miedler L.Misolic F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (51 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Miedler L.Misolic F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
13
79
Break points saved·Clear edge
78
91
Break points won·Dominant
10
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
9
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Miedler L.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Misolic F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.8
Surface form
6.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.
Sels J.
7-667-63
Semi-finals
Kovalik J.
Ymer E.[4]
7-53-66-4
Sels J.
Gombos N.[3]
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Sels J.
Zeppieri G.
6-33-1
Kovalik J.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-16-3
Gombos N.[3]
Ofner S.
1-66-36-2
Ymer E.[4]
Klein L.
7-56-3
R16
Gombos N.[3]
Mager G.
6-47-5
Zeppieri G.
Ejupovic E.
6-46-4
Sels J.
Coria F.[1]
4-67-656-3
Rodionov J.[6]
Lenz J.
6-46-2
Ymer E.[4]
Sousa P.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.
Gakhov I.
6-34-0
Klein L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-67-646-4
Ofner S.
Miedler L.
7-56-2
R32
Kovalik J.
Tseng C.[2]
5-76-36-4
Gakhov I.
Melzer G.
6-27-5
Lenz J.
Kuzmanov D.
6-756-26-1
Rodionov J.[6]
Hassan B.
7-656-4
Ymer E.[4]
Neumayer L.
6-36-4
Sousa P.
Passaro F.
6-46-4
Klein L.
Novak D.[5]
7-696-4
Miedler L.
Misolic F.[7]
6-47-66
Meligeni Alves F.
Kolar Z.
6-37-63
Ofner S.
Stebe C.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Cobolli F.
6-26-737-67
Gombos N.[3]
Tirante T.
7-56-4
Ejupovic E.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-47-5
Sels J.
Janvier M.
4-66-46-3
Coria F.[1]
Shevchenko A.
6-43-66-3