Tomas Machac vs Zsombor Piros — Cassis CH Quarter-final

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Tomas Machac
CZE4
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2022
hard
Zsombor Piros
HUN7
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1629Hard ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Machac T.
4-6 7-6 6-1
Piros Z.
Machac T.
47762
Piros Z.
66511

Tomas Machac defeated Zsombor Piros 4-6 7-6 6-1 in the Cassis CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Piros Z.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
57
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
84
Break points won·Dominant
80
32
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Piros Z.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+200 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1629
6.8Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1661
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
8.3
Surface form
4.7
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Machac T.Piros Z.
Freshness·
—
54

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Grenier H.[3]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Machac T.[4]
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Gojo B.
6-33-66-4
Grenier H.[3]
Uchida K.[8]
6-47-65
Maestrelli F.
Lestienne C.[1]
3-67-606-3
Machac T.[4]
Piros Z.[7]
4-67-656-1
R16
Machac T.[4]
Moriya H.
2-66-46-3
Piros Z.[7]
Atmane T.
1-66-46-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-47-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Debru G.
7-646-4
Grenier H.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-34-67-65
Uchida K.[8]
Furness E.
6-46-1
Maestrelli F.
Peniston R.[6]
4-67-56-1
Gojo B.
Struff J.[5]
5-76-37-66
R32
Duckworth J.[2]
Bellier A.
6-42-66-2
Debru G.
Olivetti A.
6-46-3
Struff J.[5]
Mansouri S.
3-67-656-3
Machac T.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-3
Moriya H.
Bellucci T.
6-46-3
Atmane T.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-17-64
Piros Z.[7]
De Schepper K.
6-46-3
Grenier H.[3]
Martineau M.
6-16-4
Maestrelli F.
Bertrand R.
6-27-63
Lestienne C.[1]
Medjedovic H.
7-56-3
Furness E.
Tabur C.
7-657-5
Uchida K.[8]
Chidekh C.
4-66-36-4
Gojo B.
Celikbilek A.
6-756-07-64
Lokoli L.
Clarke J.
6-37-5
Peniston R.[6]
Zuk K.
6-36-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Escoffier A.
7-655-76-4