Jerzy Janowicz vs Carlos Taberner — Seville CH Round of 16

Seville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
POL
Jerzy Janowicz
35 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2022
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP4
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Janowicz J.
1-6 6-4 7-6
Taberner C.
Janowicz J.
167102
Taberner C.
64681

Jerzy Janowicz defeated Carlos Taberner 1-6 6-4 7-6 in the Seville CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Carlos Taberner came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Janowicz J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Janowicz J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Janowicz J.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
1.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (10 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Janowicz J.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
93
74
Break points won·Dominant
12
59
Deciding sets·Slight edge
66
75
Tiebreaks·Even
21
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Janowicz J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Taberner C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
4.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.6
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
6-37-66
Semi-finals
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-16-1
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
Skatov T.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
Marozsan F.
6-36-2
Skatov T.
Janowicz J.
6-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Delbonis F.[6]
6-16-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Coppejans K.
7-663-66-2
R16
Skatov T.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-23-2
Janowicz J.
Taberner C.[4]
1-66-47-68
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-36-3
Marozsan F.
Bonadio R.
6-32-66-2
Delbonis F.[6]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-2
Coppejans K.
Merida Aguilar D.
2-66-27-64
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
Fonio G.
7-646-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Durasovic V.
6-46-4
R32
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Zekic M.
6-46-756-1
Zapata Miralles B.[2]
Serdarusic N.
6-26-4
Taberner C.[4]
Jianu F.
6-26-3
Skatov T.
Brancaccio R.
6-46-4
Delbonis F.[6]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-56-76
Merida Aguilar D.
Lopez Montagud C.
6-757-616-3
Coppejans K.
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-746-2
Bonadio R.
Alvarez Varona N.
6-27-66
Durasovic V.
Muller A.[7]
7-53-66-2
Janowicz J.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-666-1
Bobrov B.
Virtanen O.
6-26-2
Barranco Cosano J.
Trungelliti M.[8]
4-66-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Giustino L.
7-654-66-1
Marozsan F.
Agamenone F.[5]
6-36-3
Fonio G.
Svrcina D.
6-36-1
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Moroni G.
4-66-26-4