Borna Gojo vs Jan Lennard Struff — Cassis CH Round of 16

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2022
hard
Jan Lennard Struff
GER5
Jan Lennard Struff
#41ATP
1694ELO
1634Hard ELO
$492kYTD
$13MCAREER
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
Gojo B.
5-7 6-3 7-6
Struff J.
Gojo B.
56782
Struff J.
73661

Borna Gojo defeated Jan Lennard Struff 5-7 6-3 7-6 in the Cassis CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jan Lennard Struff came in ranked #41.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Struff J.

Struff J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gojo B.Struff J.
—
Serve
36
—
Return
41

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Struff J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
10.4
8.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Struff J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
61
Break points saved·Even
95
99
Break points won·Slight edge
10
21
Deciding sets·Even
70
68
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Struff J.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.3+28 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Hard Elo 1634
4.8Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1694
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
0.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Struff J.
Freshness·Dominant
100
71

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Struff J.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Grenier H.[3]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Machac T.[4]
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Gojo B.
6-33-66-4
Grenier H.[3]
Uchida K.[8]
6-47-65
Maestrelli F.
Lestienne C.[1]
3-67-606-3
Machac T.[4]
Piros Z.[7]
4-67-656-1
R16
Machac T.[4]
Moriya H.
2-66-46-3
Piros Z.[7]
Atmane T.
1-66-46-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-47-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Debru G.
7-646-4
Grenier H.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-34-67-65
Uchida K.[8]
Furness E.
6-46-1
Maestrelli F.
Peniston R.[6]
4-67-56-1
Gojo B.
Struff J.[5]
5-76-37-66
R32
Duckworth J.[2]
Bellier A.
6-42-66-2
Debru G.
Olivetti A.
6-46-3
Struff J.[5]
Mansouri S.
3-67-656-3
Machac T.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-3
Moriya H.
Bellucci T.
6-46-3
Atmane T.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-17-64
Piros Z.[7]
De Schepper K.
6-46-3
Grenier H.[3]
Martineau M.
6-16-4
Maestrelli F.
Bertrand R.
6-27-63
Lestienne C.[1]
Medjedovic H.
7-56-3
Furness E.
Tabur C.
7-657-5
Uchida K.[8]
Chidekh C.
4-66-36-4
Gojo B.
Celikbilek A.
6-756-07-64
Lokoli L.
Clarke J.
6-37-5
Peniston R.[6]
Zuk K.
6-36-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Escoffier A.
7-655-76-4