Tomas Machac vs Michael Geerts — Cassis CH Round of 32

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tomas Machac
CZE4
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2022
hard
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Machac T.
6-2 6-3
Geerts M.
Machac T.
662
Geerts M.
230

Tomas Machac defeated Michael Geerts 6-2 6-3 in the Cassis CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in ranked #53.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Geerts M.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
9
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
82
Break points won·Dominant
80
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
8.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Geerts M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+447 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1383
10.0Overall Elo 1866
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.3
Surface form
5.2
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Machac T.Geerts M.
Freshness·
—
89

Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Grenier H.[3]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Machac T.[4]
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Gojo B.
6-33-66-4
Grenier H.[3]
Uchida K.[8]
6-47-65
Maestrelli F.
Lestienne C.[1]
3-67-606-3
Machac T.[4]
Piros Z.[7]
4-67-656-1
R16
Machac T.[4]
Moriya H.
2-66-46-3
Piros Z.[7]
Atmane T.
1-66-46-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-47-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Debru G.
7-646-4
Grenier H.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-34-67-65
Uchida K.[8]
Furness E.
6-46-1
Maestrelli F.
Peniston R.[6]
4-67-56-1
Gojo B.
Struff J.[5]
5-76-37-66
R32
Duckworth J.[2]
Bellier A.
6-42-66-2
Debru G.
Olivetti A.
6-46-3
Struff J.[5]
Mansouri S.
3-67-656-3
Machac T.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-3
Moriya H.
Bellucci T.
6-46-3
Atmane T.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-17-64
Piros Z.[7]
De Schepper K.
6-46-3
Grenier H.[3]
Martineau M.
6-16-4
Maestrelli F.
Bertrand R.
6-27-63
Lestienne C.[1]
Medjedovic H.
7-56-3
Furness E.
Tabur C.
7-657-5
Uchida K.[8]
Chidekh C.
4-66-36-4
Gojo B.
Celikbilek A.
6-756-07-64
Lokoli L.
Clarke J.
6-37-5
Peniston R.[6]
Zuk K.
6-36-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Escoffier A.
7-655-76-4