Ivan Gakhov vs Gerald Melzer — Tulln CH Round of 32

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#387ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2022
clay
AUT
Gerald Melzer
36 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Gakhov I.
6-2 7-5
Melzer G.
Gakhov I.
672
Melzer G.
250

Ivan Gakhov defeated Gerald Melzer 6-2 7-5 in the Tulln CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Gerald Melzer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Ivan Gakhov claimed a first win over Gerald Melzer in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-07-25KitzbuhelQ2clayGerald Melzer6-3 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Melzer G.

Melzer G.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Melzer G.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
3.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 77). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Melzer G.
Clutch Rating·Even
34
34
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
77
Break points won·Slight edge
9
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
59
53
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
22
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Melzer G.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
4.4
Surface form
6.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.
Sels J.
7-667-63
Semi-finals
Kovalik J.
Ymer E.[4]
7-53-66-4
Sels J.
Gombos N.[3]
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Sels J.
Zeppieri G.
6-33-1
Kovalik J.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-16-3
Gombos N.[3]
Ofner S.
1-66-36-2
Ymer E.[4]
Klein L.
7-56-3
R16
Gombos N.[3]
Mager G.
6-47-5
Zeppieri G.
Ejupovic E.
6-46-4
Sels J.
Coria F.[1]
4-67-656-3
Rodionov J.[6]
Lenz J.
6-46-2
Ymer E.[4]
Sousa P.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.
Gakhov I.
6-34-0
Klein L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-67-646-4
Ofner S.
Miedler L.
7-56-2
R32
Kovalik J.
Tseng C.[2]
5-76-36-4
Gakhov I.
Melzer G.
6-27-5
Lenz J.
Kuzmanov D.
6-756-26-1
Rodionov J.[6]
Hassan B.
7-656-4
Ymer E.[4]
Neumayer L.
6-36-4
Sousa P.
Passaro F.
6-46-4
Klein L.
Novak D.[5]
7-696-4
Miedler L.
Misolic F.[7]
6-47-66
Meligeni Alves F.
Kolar Z.
6-37-63
Ofner S.
Stebe C.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Cobolli F.
6-26-737-67
Gombos N.[3]
Tirante T.
7-56-4
Ejupovic E.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-47-5
Sels J.
Janvier M.
4-66-46-3
Coria F.[1]
Shevchenko A.
6-43-66-3