Borna Gojo vs Altug Celikbilek — Cassis CH Round of 32

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 September 2022
hard
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Gojo B.
6-7 6-0 7-6
Celikbilek A.
Gojo B.
656772
Celikbilek A.
770641

Borna Gojo defeated Altug Celikbilek 6-7 6-0 7-6 in the Cassis CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Altug Celikbilek came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
67%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
6.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
40
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
73
Break points won·Dominant
10
38
Deciding sets·Clear edge
70
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Celikbilek A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Celikbilek A.
Freshness·
100
—

Gojo B.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Grenier H.[3]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Machac T.[4]
6-36-4
Grenier H.[3]
Maestrelli F.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[2]
Gojo B.
6-33-66-4
Grenier H.[3]
Uchida K.[8]
6-47-65
Maestrelli F.
Lestienne C.[1]
3-67-606-3
Machac T.[4]
Piros Z.[7]
4-67-656-1
R16
Machac T.[4]
Moriya H.
2-66-46-3
Piros Z.[7]
Atmane T.
1-66-46-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-47-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Debru G.
7-646-4
Grenier H.[3]
Lokoli L.
6-34-67-65
Uchida K.[8]
Furness E.
6-46-1
Maestrelli F.
Peniston R.[6]
4-67-56-1
Gojo B.
Struff J.[5]
5-76-37-66
R32
Duckworth J.[2]
Bellier A.
6-42-66-2
Debru G.
Olivetti A.
6-46-3
Struff J.[5]
Mansouri S.
3-67-656-3
Machac T.[4]
Geerts M.
6-26-3
Moriya H.
Bellucci T.
6-46-3
Atmane T.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-17-64
Piros Z.[7]
De Schepper K.
6-46-3
Grenier H.[3]
Martineau M.
6-16-4
Maestrelli F.
Bertrand R.
6-27-63
Lestienne C.[1]
Medjedovic H.
7-56-3
Furness E.
Tabur C.
7-657-5
Uchida K.[8]
Chidekh C.
4-66-36-4
Gojo B.
Celikbilek A.
6-756-07-64
Lokoli L.
Clarke J.
6-37-5
Peniston R.[6]
Zuk K.
6-36-2
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Escoffier A.
7-655-76-4