Arthur Cazaux vs Omar Jasika — Nonthaburi 3 CH Semi-final

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 5 September 2022
hard
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Cazaux A.
6-0 3-0
Jasika O.
Cazaux A.
63–
Jasika O.
00–

Arthur Cazaux advanced when Omar Jasika retired 6-0 3-0 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH semi-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Jasika O.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Jasika O.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Jasika O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
69%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
76%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Jasika O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
0
Break points saved·Dominant
97
47
Break points won·Clear edge
27
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
8.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Jasika O.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
10.0+466 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1272
10.0Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1296
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.7
Surface form
6.9
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
1.9
Minutes 14d
0.0
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Parker S.
Cazaux A.
6-44-1
Semi-finals
Parker S.
Shimabukuro S.
7-656-4
Cazaux A.
Jasika O.
6-03-0
Quarter-finals
Parker S.
Harris B.[4]
6-46-4
Shimabukuro S.
Watanuki Y.[1]
7-676-0
Jasika O.
Ochi M.
6-16-1
Cazaux A.
Ly N.[3]
6-33-66-0
R16
Jasika O.
Istomin D.
6-46-3
Cazaux A.
Gunneswaran P.[8]
7-626-1
Parker S.
Oliel Y.
4-66-36-4
Ly N.[3]
Gaio F.
6-44-66-3
Watanuki Y.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-36-3
Harris B.[4]
Brymer G.
2-66-16-2
Shimabukuro S.
Shimizu Y.
2-66-36-4
Ochi M.
Santillan A.
6-21-0
R32
Zhukayev B.
Donskoy E.
7-647-64
Jasika O.
Rai A.
6-25-77-66
Santillan A.
Vacherot V.[2]
7-51-66-4
Ochi M.
Samrej K.
7-53-66-3
Istomin D.
Sweeny D.[7]
6-26-3
Ly N.[3]
Chatpatcharoen P.
7-56-2
Oliel Y.
Kachmazov A.[6]
6-43-66-2
Brymer G.
Mccabe J.
2-66-36-4
Harris B.[4]
Lock B.
6-37-64
Shimabukuro S.
Broom C.
6-36-2
Parker S.
Yunchaokete B.
6-47-5
Cazaux A.
Isarow P.
7-56-1
Shimizu Y.
Kuhn N.[5]
6-16-2
Gaio F.
Patael B.
6-756-46-3
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Charoenphon Y.
6-16-2
Watanuki Y.[1]
Chung Y.
7-56-725-3