Louis Wessels vs Johan Nikles — Toulouse CH Round of 32

Toulouse CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Louis Wessels
#691ATP
27 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
clay
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#425ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Wessels L.
6-3 2-6 7-5
Nikles J.
Wessels L.
6272
Nikles J.
3651

Louis Wessels defeated Johan Nikles 6-3 2-6 7-5 in the Toulouse CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Louis Wessels closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wessels L.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Nikles J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Wessels L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wessels L.Nikles J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
55%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.2
1.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (98 vs 74). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wessels L.Nikles J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
7
Break points saved·Dominant
71
22
Break points won·Dominant
4
30
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
28
Tiebreaks·
53
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wessels L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Nikles J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
2.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Coppejans K.
Janvier M.
6-786-46-3
Semi-finals
Coppejans K.
Wessels L.
6-06-1
Janvier M.
Droguet T.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Wessels L.
Trungelliti M.[5]
7-642-67-64
Droguet T.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-43-66-2
Coppejans K.
Van Assche L.
6-16-3
Janvier M.
Fils A.
6-43-66-1
R16
Van Assche L.
Ymer E.[2]
3-66-46-1
Wessels L.
Hassan B.
6-736-26-3
Fils A.
Blanchet U.
6-46-4
Droguet T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-47-61
Ferreira Silva F.
Taberner C.[1]
6-47-64
Trungelliti M.[5]
Gakhov I.
6-33-66-3
Coppejans K.
Reymond A.
6-06-0
Janvier M.
Mager G.[4]
7-636-4
R32
Ymer E.[2]
Domingues J.
6-46-1
Coppejans K.
Marozsan F.[7]
5-76-47-5
Hassan B.
Muller A.[3]
6-16-3
Wessels L.
Nikles J.
6-32-67-5
Blanchet U.
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
7-56-3
Janvier M.
Lama G.
6-47-69
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Ajdukovic D.
6-24-66-0
Ferreira Silva F.
Giustino L.
6-756-36-4
Taberner C.[1]
Erhard M.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Burruchaga R.
5-76-07-66
Mager G.[4]
Chepelev A.
6-37-68
Fils A.
Drzewiecki K.
7-696-1
Van Assche L.
Sels J.
6-46-2
Droguet T.
Diaz Acosta F.[6]
4-66-16-4
Trungelliti M.[5]
Briand J.
1-66-36-2
Reymond A.
Skatov T.
7-657-67