Nam Hoang Ly vs James Mccabe — Nonthaburi 2 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
hard
AUS
James Mccabe
#207ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Ly N.
3-6 6-3 6-2
Mccabe J.
Ly N.
3662
Mccabe J.
6321

Nam Hoang Ly defeated James Mccabe 3-6 6-3 6-2 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ly N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Mccabe J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ly N.Mccabe J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.0
7.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (40 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ly N.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mccabe J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.7
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.2
Minutes 14d
7.4
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ly N.Mccabe J.
Freshness·
—
89

Mccabe J.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.
Jasika O.
7-666-4
Semi-finals
Jasika O.
Decamps G.[5]
5-76-43-0
Cazaux A.
Zhukayev B.
6-17-66
Quarter-finals
Decamps G.[5]
Gaio F.
6-37-5
Cazaux A.
Sweeny D.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Vacherot V.
7-53-67-62
Jasika O.
Broom C.
6-11-66-3
R16
Jasika O.
Marchenko I.[7]
2-66-36-4
Cazaux A.
Harris B.[6]
6-16-1
Zhukayev B.
Shimabukuro S.
2-66-36-4
Sweeny D.
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Decamps G.[5]
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Vacherot V.
Watanuki Y.[1]
7-626-3
Broom C.
Patael B.
3-66-37-67
Gaio F.
Ly N.
7-57-5
R32
Patael B.
Gray A.[2]
6-34-66-4
Broom C.
Schoolkate T.
7-57-64
Samrej K.
Chanta T.
7-666-1
Decamps G.[5]
Fomin S.
6-26-2
Harris B.[6]
Chung Y.
6-34-66-4
Sweeny D.
Yevseyev D.[4]
3-66-06-0
Zhukayev B.
Shimizu Y.
6-37-68
Vacherot V.
Santillan A.
6-12-66-3
Watanuki Y.[1]
Kachmazov A.
6-16-3
Shimabukuro S.
Cukierman D.
6-26-4
Marchenko I.[7]
Oliel Y.
6-36-2
Gaio F.
Yunchaokete B.
6-776-26-2
Donskoy E.
Lock B.
7-56-3
Cazaux A.
Koaykul K.
6-26-1
Jasika O.
Gunneswaran P.
7-56-3
Ly N.
Mccabe J.
3-66-36-2