Jerzy Janowicz vs Ryan Peniston — Manacor CH Round of 16

Manacor CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
POL
Jerzy Janowicz
35 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
hard
Ryan Peniston
GBR2
Ryan Peniston
#389ATP
1441ELO
1402Hard ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Janowicz J.
6-2 6-4
Peniston R.
Janowicz J.
662
Peniston R.
240

Jerzy Janowicz defeated Ryan Peniston 6-2 6-4 in the Manacor CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Janowicz J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Peniston R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Janowicz J.

Serve advantage — Peniston R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Janowicz J.Peniston R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Clear edge
70%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (10 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Janowicz J.Peniston R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
20
Break points saved·Dominant
93
60
Break points won·Clear edge
12
25
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
36
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
21
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Janowicz J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Peniston R.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.[7]
Bergs Z.[4]
7-623-67-5
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[4]
Shelbayh A.
6-46-4
Nardi L.[7]
Lazarov A.
6-716-36-1
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.[7]
Janowicz J.
6-23-66-1
Lazarov A.
Kukushkin M.
6-746-47-63
Shelbayh A.
Popko D.
5-76-36-1
Bergs Z.[4]
Clarke J.
6-36-2
R16
Janowicz J.
Peniston R.[2]
6-26-4
Nardi L.[7]
Celikbilek A.
6-47-5
Lazarov A.
Vukic A.[3]
6-34-66-4
Kukushkin M.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-4
Bergs Z.[4]
Furness E.
6-37-68
Popko D.
Riedi L.
6-736-46-1
Clarke J.
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Shelbayh A.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-14-1
R32
Clarke J.
Barrere G.[5]
1-67-661-1
Janowicz J.
Ofner S.
6-36-4
Nardi L.[7]
De Jong J.
3-66-16-2
Kukushkin M.
Maestrelli F.
6-22-66-2
Bellier A.
Alvarez Varona N.
3-66-36-1
Furness E.
Zuk K.
4-66-37-67
Bergs Z.[4]
Rincon D.
6-36-2
Popko D.
Uchida K.[6]
5-76-46-2
Shelbayh A.
Stricker D.[1]
6-27-5
Menendez Maceiras A.
Glinka D.
6-43-66-3
Vukic A.[3]
Lokoli L.
1-66-17-61
Riedi L.
Olivetti A.
3-66-46-4
Peniston R.[2]
Vallejo A.
6-16-2
Celikbilek A.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Lazarov A.
Medjedovic H.
6-16-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Masur D.[9]
3-67-616-3