Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Lucas Gerch — Como CH Round of 16

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#342ATP
1556ELO
1545Clay ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
clay
GER
Lucas Gerch
#914ATP
31 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWW
Stebe C.
4-6 6-3 6-2
Gerch L.
Stebe C.
4662
Gerch L.
6321

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Lucas Gerch 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the Como CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gerch L.

Gerch L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Gerch L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Even
3.5
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
4.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 107). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Gerch L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
0
Break points saved·Dominant
75
27
Break points won·Even
10
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stebe C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gerch L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
7.3
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
5.0
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Stebe C.
Passaro F.[3]
7-626-4
Semi-finals
Stebe C.
Arnaldi M.[5]
6-14-1
Passaro F.[3]
Klein L.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Klein L.
Bonadio R.[6]
4-66-26-4
Stebe C.
De Schepper K.
6-36-2
Arnaldi M.[5]
Fatic N.
7-52-67-64
Passaro F.[3]
Gigante M.
6-746-17-5
R16
Bonadio R.[6]
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-3
Stebe C.
Gerch L.
4-66-36-2
Fatic N.
Miedler L.
6-36-3
Passaro F.[3]
Dzumhur D.
6-27-5
Arnaldi M.[5]
Oradini G.
2-67-56-2
Klein L.
Zeppieri G.[2]
7-652-67-68
Gigante M.
Zekic M.
6-33-67-65
De Schepper K.
Copil M.
5-76-47-5
R32
Klein L.
Ferrari G.
4-66-16-4
Arnaboldi F.
Andreev A.
7-641-66-3
Bonadio R.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-46-747-65
Dzumhur D.
Krutykh O.
7-56-3
Zekic M.
Travaglia S.[7]
6-36-4
Copil M.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
7-644-67-62
Stebe C.
Basic M.
6-46-0
Gerch L.
Milojevic N.[4]
7-627-5
Fatic N.
Cecchinato M.[1]
6-727-626-1
Passaro F.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-654-66-3
Oradini G.
Torres J.
6-15-76-3
Zeppieri G.[2]
Cretu C.
7-616-2
Gigante M.
Moroni G.
6-746-26-1
De Schepper K.
Giannessi A.
4-66-31-0
Arnaldi M.[5]
Sachko V.
6-20-0
Miedler L.
Virtanen O.
2-67-623-1