Federico Gaio vs Nam Hoang Ly — Nonthaburi 2 CH Round of 16

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
hard
VIE
Nam Hoang Ly
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLLL
Gaio F.
7-5 7-5
Ly N.
Gaio F.
772
Ly N.
550

Federico Gaio defeated Nam Hoang Ly 7-5 7-5 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaio F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ly N.

Ly N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaio F.Ly N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (127 vs 40). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaio F.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ly N.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
6.6
0.0
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
3.2
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.
Jasika O.
7-666-4
Semi-finals
Jasika O.
Decamps G.[5]
5-76-43-0
Cazaux A.
Zhukayev B.
6-17-66
Quarter-finals
Decamps G.[5]
Gaio F.
6-37-5
Cazaux A.
Sweeny D.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Vacherot V.
7-53-67-62
Jasika O.
Broom C.
6-11-66-3
R16
Jasika O.
Marchenko I.[7]
2-66-36-4
Cazaux A.
Harris B.[6]
6-16-1
Zhukayev B.
Shimabukuro S.
2-66-36-4
Sweeny D.
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Decamps G.[5]
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Vacherot V.
Watanuki Y.[1]
7-626-3
Broom C.
Patael B.
3-66-37-67
Gaio F.
Ly N.
7-57-5
R32
Patael B.
Gray A.[2]
6-34-66-4
Broom C.
Schoolkate T.
7-57-64
Samrej K.
Chanta T.
7-666-1
Decamps G.[5]
Fomin S.
6-26-2
Harris B.[6]
Chung Y.
6-34-66-4
Sweeny D.
Yevseyev D.[4]
3-66-06-0
Zhukayev B.
Shimizu Y.
6-37-68
Vacherot V.
Santillan A.
6-12-66-3
Watanuki Y.[1]
Kachmazov A.
6-16-3
Shimabukuro S.
Cukierman D.
6-26-4
Marchenko I.[7]
Oliel Y.
6-36-2
Gaio F.
Yunchaokete B.
6-776-26-2
Donskoy E.
Lock B.
7-56-3
Cazaux A.
Koaykul K.
6-26-1
Jasika O.
Gunneswaran P.
7-56-3
Ly N.
Mccabe J.
3-66-36-2