Evan Furness vs Kacper Zuk — Manacor CH Round of 32

Manacor CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Evan Furness
27 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
hard
POL
Kacper Zuk
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLW
Furness E.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Zuk K.
Furness E.
46792
Zuk K.
63671

Evan Furness defeated Kacper Zuk 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Manacor CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Kacper Zuk came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Furness E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zuk K.

Zuk K.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Furness E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Furness E.Zuk K.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
5.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Furness E.Zuk K.
Clutch Rating·Even
22
18
Break points saved·Dominant
47
76
Break points won·Slight edge
18
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
44
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
49
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Furness E.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Zuk K.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
4.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.[7]
Bergs Z.[4]
7-623-67-5
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[4]
Shelbayh A.
6-46-4
Nardi L.[7]
Lazarov A.
6-716-36-1
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.[7]
Janowicz J.
6-23-66-1
Lazarov A.
Kukushkin M.
6-746-47-63
Shelbayh A.
Popko D.
5-76-36-1
Bergs Z.[4]
Clarke J.
6-36-2
R16
Janowicz J.
Peniston R.[2]
6-26-4
Nardi L.[7]
Celikbilek A.
6-47-5
Lazarov A.
Vukic A.[3]
6-34-66-4
Kukushkin M.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-4
Bergs Z.[4]
Furness E.
6-37-68
Popko D.
Riedi L.
6-736-46-1
Clarke J.
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Shelbayh A.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-14-1
R32
Clarke J.
Barrere G.[5]
1-67-661-1
Janowicz J.
Ofner S.
6-36-4
Nardi L.[7]
De Jong J.
3-66-16-2
Kukushkin M.
Maestrelli F.
6-22-66-2
Bellier A.
Alvarez Varona N.
3-66-36-1
Furness E.
Zuk K.
4-66-37-67
Bergs Z.[4]
Rincon D.
6-36-2
Popko D.
Uchida K.[6]
5-76-46-2
Shelbayh A.
Stricker D.[1]
6-27-5
Menendez Maceiras A.
Glinka D.
6-43-66-3
Vukic A.[3]
Lokoli L.
1-66-17-61
Riedi L.
Olivetti A.
3-66-46-4
Peniston R.[2]
Vallejo A.
6-16-2
Celikbilek A.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Lazarov A.
Medjedovic H.
6-16-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Masur D.[9]
3-67-616-3