Arthur Cazaux vs Dane Sweeny — Nonthaburi 2 CH Quarter-final

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
hard
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Cazaux A.
6-1 6-4
Sweeny D.
Cazaux A.
662
Sweeny D.
140

Arthur Cazaux defeated Dane Sweeny 6-1 6-4 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Sweeny D.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 172). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
45
Break points saved·Dominant
97
69
Break points won·Clear edge
27
11
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
68
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Sweeny D.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+294 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Hard Elo 1444
8.2Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
1.8Overall Elo 1460
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
6.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
5.3
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cazaux A.Sweeny D.
Freshness·
—
98

Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.
Jasika O.
7-666-4
Semi-finals
Jasika O.
Decamps G.[5]
5-76-43-0
Cazaux A.
Zhukayev B.
6-17-66
Quarter-finals
Decamps G.[5]
Gaio F.
6-37-5
Cazaux A.
Sweeny D.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Vacherot V.
7-53-67-62
Jasika O.
Broom C.
6-11-66-3
R16
Jasika O.
Marchenko I.[7]
2-66-36-4
Cazaux A.
Harris B.[6]
6-16-1
Zhukayev B.
Shimabukuro S.
2-66-36-4
Sweeny D.
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Decamps G.[5]
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Vacherot V.
Watanuki Y.[1]
7-626-3
Broom C.
Patael B.
3-66-37-67
Gaio F.
Ly N.
7-57-5
R32
Patael B.
Gray A.[2]
6-34-66-4
Broom C.
Schoolkate T.
7-57-64
Samrej K.
Chanta T.
7-666-1
Decamps G.[5]
Fomin S.
6-26-2
Harris B.[6]
Chung Y.
6-34-66-4
Sweeny D.
Yevseyev D.[4]
3-66-06-0
Zhukayev B.
Shimizu Y.
6-37-68
Vacherot V.
Santillan A.
6-12-66-3
Watanuki Y.[1]
Kachmazov A.
6-16-3
Shimabukuro S.
Cukierman D.
6-26-4
Marchenko I.[7]
Oliel Y.
6-36-2
Gaio F.
Yunchaokete B.
6-776-26-2
Donskoy E.
Lock B.
7-56-3
Cazaux A.
Koaykul K.
6-26-1
Jasika O.
Gunneswaran P.
7-56-3
Ly N.
Mccabe J.
3-66-36-2