Arthur Cazaux vs Omar Jasika — Nonthaburi 2 CH Final

Nonthaburi 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
hard
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Cazaux A.
7-6 6-4
Jasika O.
Cazaux A.
7862
Jasika O.
6640

Arthur Cazaux defeated Omar Jasika 7-6 6-4 in the Nonthaburi 2 CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Jasika O.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Jasika O.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Jasika O.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
69%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
76%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Jasika O.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
65
0
Break points saved·Dominant
97
47
Break points won·Clear edge
27
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Jasika O.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+466 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1272
10.0Overall Elo 1793
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1296
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
6.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cazaux A.
Jasika O.
7-666-4
Semi-finals
Jasika O.
Decamps G.[5]
5-76-43-0
Cazaux A.
Zhukayev B.
6-17-66
Quarter-finals
Decamps G.[5]
Gaio F.
6-37-5
Cazaux A.
Sweeny D.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Vacherot V.
7-53-67-62
Jasika O.
Broom C.
6-11-66-3
R16
Jasika O.
Marchenko I.[7]
2-66-36-4
Cazaux A.
Harris B.[6]
6-16-1
Zhukayev B.
Shimabukuro S.
2-66-36-4
Sweeny D.
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Decamps G.[5]
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Vacherot V.
Watanuki Y.[1]
7-626-3
Broom C.
Patael B.
3-66-37-67
Gaio F.
Ly N.
7-57-5
R32
Patael B.
Gray A.[2]
6-34-66-4
Broom C.
Schoolkate T.
7-57-64
Samrej K.
Chanta T.
7-666-1
Decamps G.[5]
Fomin S.
6-26-2
Harris B.[6]
Chung Y.
6-34-66-4
Sweeny D.
Yevseyev D.[4]
3-66-06-0
Zhukayev B.
Shimizu Y.
6-37-68
Vacherot V.
Santillan A.
6-12-66-3
Watanuki Y.[1]
Kachmazov A.
6-16-3
Shimabukuro S.
Cukierman D.
6-26-4
Marchenko I.[7]
Oliel Y.
6-36-2
Gaio F.
Yunchaokete B.
6-776-26-2
Donskoy E.
Lock B.
7-56-3
Cazaux A.
Koaykul K.
6-26-1
Jasika O.
Gunneswaran P.
7-56-3
Ly N.
Mccabe J.
3-66-36-2