Zizou Bergs vs Abedallah Shelbayh — Manacor CH Semi-final

Manacor CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Zizou Bergs
BEL4
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
hard
JOR
Abedallah Shelbayh
1442ELO
1448Hard ELO
22 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Bergs Z.
6-4 6-4
Shelbayh A.
Bergs Z.
662
Shelbayh A.
440

Zizou Bergs defeated Abedallah Shelbayh 6-4 6-4 in the Manacor CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Zizou Bergs edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Shelbayh A.

Shelbayh A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Serve advantage — Bergs Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bergs Z.Shelbayh A.
25
Serve
—
40
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Shelbayh A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Shelbayh A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
74
Break points won·Slight edge
21
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
54
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Shelbayh A.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
8.8+309 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Hard Elo 1448
9.5Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
0.5Overall Elo 1442
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Shelbayh A.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
100

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Shelbayh A.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.[7]
Bergs Z.[4]
7-623-67-5
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[4]
Shelbayh A.
6-46-4
Nardi L.[7]
Lazarov A.
6-716-36-1
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.[7]
Janowicz J.
6-23-66-1
Lazarov A.
Kukushkin M.
6-746-47-63
Shelbayh A.
Popko D.
5-76-36-1
Bergs Z.[4]
Clarke J.
6-36-2
R16
Janowicz J.
Peniston R.[2]
6-26-4
Nardi L.[7]
Celikbilek A.
6-47-5
Lazarov A.
Vukic A.[3]
6-34-66-4
Kukushkin M.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-4
Bergs Z.[4]
Furness E.
6-37-68
Popko D.
Riedi L.
6-736-46-1
Clarke J.
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Shelbayh A.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-14-1
R32
Clarke J.
Barrere G.[5]
1-67-661-1
Janowicz J.
Ofner S.
6-36-4
Nardi L.[7]
De Jong J.
3-66-16-2
Kukushkin M.
Maestrelli F.
6-22-66-2
Bellier A.
Alvarez Varona N.
3-66-36-1
Furness E.
Zuk K.
4-66-37-67
Bergs Z.[4]
Rincon D.
6-36-2
Popko D.
Uchida K.[6]
5-76-46-2
Shelbayh A.
Stricker D.[1]
6-27-5
Menendez Maceiras A.
Glinka D.
6-43-66-3
Vukic A.[3]
Lokoli L.
1-66-17-61
Riedi L.
Olivetti A.
3-66-46-4
Peniston R.[2]
Vallejo A.
6-16-2
Celikbilek A.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Lazarov A.
Medjedovic H.
6-16-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Masur D.[9]
3-67-616-3