Zizou Bergs vs Jay Clarke — Manacor CH Quarter-final

Manacor CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Zizou Bergs
BEL4
Zizou Bergs
#37ATP
1808ELO
1757Hard ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
hard
GBR
Jay Clarke
#246ATP
1458ELO
1421Hard ELO
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLWL
Bergs Z.
6-3 6-2
Clarke J.
Bergs Z.
662
Clarke J.
320

Zizou Bergs defeated Jay Clarke 6-3 6-2 in the Manacor CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #37.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Clarke J.

Clarke J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Serve advantage — Bergs Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Bergs Z.Clarke J.
25
Serve
—
40
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Clarke J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.7
3.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Clarke J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
8
Break points saved·Dominant
95
63
Break points won·Even
21
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Clarke J.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 42 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
9.3+336 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.7Hard Elo 1421
9.6Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
0.4Overall Elo 1458
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Clarke J.
Freshness·Dominant
74
100

Bergs Z.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d) · Clarke J.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Nardi L.[7]
Bergs Z.[4]
7-623-67-5
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.[4]
Shelbayh A.
6-46-4
Nardi L.[7]
Lazarov A.
6-716-36-1
Quarter-finals
Nardi L.[7]
Janowicz J.
6-23-66-1
Lazarov A.
Kukushkin M.
6-746-47-63
Shelbayh A.
Popko D.
5-76-36-1
Bergs Z.[4]
Clarke J.
6-36-2
R16
Janowicz J.
Peniston R.[2]
6-26-4
Nardi L.[7]
Celikbilek A.
6-47-5
Lazarov A.
Vukic A.[3]
6-34-66-4
Kukushkin M.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-4
Bergs Z.[4]
Furness E.
6-37-68
Popko D.
Riedi L.
6-736-46-1
Clarke J.
Bellier A.
6-46-4
Shelbayh A.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-14-1
R32
Clarke J.
Barrere G.[5]
1-67-661-1
Janowicz J.
Ofner S.
6-36-4
Nardi L.[7]
De Jong J.
3-66-16-2
Kukushkin M.
Maestrelli F.
6-22-66-2
Bellier A.
Alvarez Varona N.
3-66-36-1
Furness E.
Zuk K.
4-66-37-67
Bergs Z.[4]
Rincon D.
6-36-2
Popko D.
Uchida K.[6]
5-76-46-2
Shelbayh A.
Stricker D.[1]
6-27-5
Menendez Maceiras A.
Glinka D.
6-43-66-3
Vukic A.[3]
Lokoli L.
1-66-17-61
Riedi L.
Olivetti A.
3-66-46-4
Peniston R.[2]
Vallejo A.
6-16-2
Celikbilek A.
Gengel M.
6-36-4
Lazarov A.
Medjedovic H.
6-16-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Masur D.[9]
3-67-616-3