Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Mirza Basic — Como CH Round of 32

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#342ATP
1556ELO
1545Clay ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
clay
Mirza Basic
BIH
Mirza Basic
#540ATP
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Stebe C.
6-4 6-0
Basic M.
Stebe C.
662
Basic M.
400

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Mirza Basic 6-4 6-0 in the Como CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Cedrik Marcel Stebe came in ranked #342, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Cedrik Marcel Stebe extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-08-28US OpenQ2hardCedrik Marcel Stebe6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Basic M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Basic M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
55%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Basic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
75
56
Break points won·Slight edge
10
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
65
Tiebreaks·Even
68
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Stebe C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Basic M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.2
Minutes 14d
8.4
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Stebe C.
Passaro F.[3]
7-626-4
Semi-finals
Stebe C.
Arnaldi M.[5]
6-14-1
Passaro F.[3]
Klein L.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Klein L.
Bonadio R.[6]
4-66-26-4
Stebe C.
De Schepper K.
6-36-2
Arnaldi M.[5]
Fatic N.
7-52-67-64
Passaro F.[3]
Gigante M.
6-746-17-5
R16
Bonadio R.[6]
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-3
Stebe C.
Gerch L.
4-66-36-2
Fatic N.
Miedler L.
6-36-3
Passaro F.[3]
Dzumhur D.
6-27-5
Arnaldi M.[5]
Oradini G.
2-67-56-2
Klein L.
Zeppieri G.[2]
7-652-67-68
Gigante M.
Zekic M.
6-33-67-65
De Schepper K.
Copil M.
5-76-47-5
R32
Klein L.
Ferrari G.
4-66-16-4
Arnaboldi F.
Andreev A.
7-641-66-3
Bonadio R.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-46-747-65
Dzumhur D.
Krutykh O.
7-56-3
Zekic M.
Travaglia S.[7]
6-36-4
Copil M.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
7-644-67-62
Stebe C.
Basic M.
6-46-0
Gerch L.
Milojevic N.[4]
7-627-5
Fatic N.
Cecchinato M.[1]
6-727-626-1
Passaro F.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-654-66-3
Oradini G.
Torres J.
6-15-76-3
Zeppieri G.[2]
Cretu C.
7-616-2
Gigante M.
Moroni G.
6-746-26-1
De Schepper K.
Giannessi A.
4-66-31-0
Arnaldi M.[5]
Sachko V.
6-20-0
Miedler L.
Virtanen O.
2-67-623-1