Kimmer Coppejans vs Luca Van Assche — Toulouse CH Quarter-final

Toulouse CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1513Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
clay
Luca Van Assche
FRA
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1639Clay ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
Coppejans K.
6-1 6-3
Van Assche L.
Coppejans K.
662
Van Assche L.
130

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Luca Van Assche 6-1 6-3 in the Toulouse CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #86.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Van Assche L.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Van Assche L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Van Assche L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
68
Break points saved·Clear edge
67
91
Break points won·Dominant
29
61
Deciding sets·Slight edge
74
81
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
43
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Coppejans K.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Van Assche L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Clay Elo 1513
Surface ELO
6.4+125 Clay Elo edge
2.9Overall Elo 1544
ELO gap
7.1Overall Elo 1701
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Van Assche L.
Freshness·Even
76
77

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d) · Van Assche L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Coppejans K.
Janvier M.
6-786-46-3
Semi-finals
Coppejans K.
Wessels L.
6-06-1
Janvier M.
Droguet T.
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Wessels L.
Trungelliti M.[5]
7-642-67-64
Droguet T.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-43-66-2
Coppejans K.
Van Assche L.
6-16-3
Janvier M.
Fils A.
6-43-66-1
R16
Van Assche L.
Ymer E.[2]
3-66-46-1
Wessels L.
Hassan B.
6-736-26-3
Fils A.
Blanchet U.
6-46-4
Droguet T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-47-61
Ferreira Silva F.
Taberner C.[1]
6-47-64
Trungelliti M.[5]
Gakhov I.
6-33-66-3
Coppejans K.
Reymond A.
6-06-0
Janvier M.
Mager G.[4]
7-636-4
R32
Ymer E.[2]
Domingues J.
6-46-1
Coppejans K.
Marozsan F.[7]
5-76-47-5
Hassan B.
Muller A.[3]
6-16-3
Wessels L.
Nikles J.
6-32-67-5
Blanchet U.
Martin Tiffon P.[8]
7-56-3
Janvier M.
Lama G.
6-47-69
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Ajdukovic D.
6-24-66-0
Ferreira Silva F.
Giustino L.
6-756-36-4
Taberner C.[1]
Erhard M.
6-36-4
Gakhov I.
Burruchaga R.
5-76-07-66
Mager G.[4]
Chepelev A.
6-37-68
Fils A.
Drzewiecki K.
7-696-1
Van Assche L.
Sels J.
6-46-2
Droguet T.
Diaz Acosta F.[6]
4-66-16-4
Trungelliti M.[5]
Briand J.
1-66-36-2
Reymond A.
Skatov T.
7-657-67