Matteo Arnaldi vs Nerman Fatic — Como CH Quarter-final

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Matteo Arnaldi
ITA5
Matteo Arnaldi
#35ATP
1830ELO
1830Clay ELO
$1.2MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 August 2022
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#373ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Arnaldi M.
7-5 2-6 7-6
Fatic N.
Arnaldi M.
72772
Fatic N.
56641

Matteo Arnaldi defeated Nerman Fatic 7-5 2-6 7-6 in the Como CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Matteo Arnaldi came in ranked #35.

Key context

  • Match story: Matteo Arnaldi closed it out in three sets, 7–5 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Arnaldi M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Arnaldi M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Arnaldi M.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Arnaldi M.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
24
Break points saved·Dominant
97
63
Break points won·Clear edge
51
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Arnaldi M.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
8.1+352 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Clay Elo 1478
7.9Overall Elo 1830
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
4.5
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.6
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Arnaldi M.Fatic N.
Freshness·
92
—

Arnaldi M.: 9 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Stebe C.
Passaro F.[3]
7-626-4
Semi-finals
Stebe C.
Arnaldi M.[5]
6-14-1
Passaro F.[3]
Klein L.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Klein L.
Bonadio R.[6]
4-66-26-4
Stebe C.
De Schepper K.
6-36-2
Arnaldi M.[5]
Fatic N.
7-52-67-64
Passaro F.[3]
Gigante M.
6-746-17-5
R16
Bonadio R.[6]
Arnaboldi F.
6-26-3
Stebe C.
Gerch L.
4-66-36-2
Fatic N.
Miedler L.
6-36-3
Passaro F.[3]
Dzumhur D.
6-27-5
Arnaldi M.[5]
Oradini G.
2-67-56-2
Klein L.
Zeppieri G.[2]
7-652-67-68
Gigante M.
Zekic M.
6-33-67-65
De Schepper K.
Copil M.
5-76-47-5
R32
Klein L.
Ferrari G.
4-66-16-4
Arnaboldi F.
Andreev A.
7-641-66-3
Bonadio R.[6]
Villanueva G.
6-46-747-65
Dzumhur D.
Krutykh O.
7-56-3
Zekic M.
Travaglia S.[7]
6-36-4
Copil M.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
7-644-67-62
Stebe C.
Basic M.
6-46-0
Gerch L.
Milojevic N.[4]
7-627-5
Fatic N.
Cecchinato M.[1]
6-727-626-1
Passaro F.[3]
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-654-66-3
Oradini G.
Torres J.
6-15-76-3
Zeppieri G.[2]
Cretu C.
7-616-2
Gigante M.
Moroni G.
6-746-26-1
De Schepper K.
Giannessi A.
4-66-31-0
Arnaldi M.[5]
Sachko V.
6-20-0
Miedler L.
Virtanen O.
2-67-623-1