Juncheng Shang vs Marko Stakusic — Granby CH Round of 32

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CHN6
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
CAN
Marko Stakusic
23 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWL
Shang J.
6-4 6-4
Stakusic M.
Shang J.
662
Stakusic M.
440

Juncheng Shang defeated Marko Stakusic 6-4 6-4 in the Granby CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Juncheng Shang edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Stakusic M.

Stakusic M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve advantage — Shang J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Stakusic M.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Stakusic M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
43%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
31%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
6.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Stakusic M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.7
Surface form
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.5
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Shang J.[6]
7-57-65
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Moriya H.[9]
6-36-4
Shang J.[6]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mayo A.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-4
Shang J.[6]
Thompson J.[3]
7-56-4
Moriya H.[9]
Humbert U.[5]
7-644-67-5
Diallo G.
Dougaz A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
6-16-4
Shang J.[6]
Markes C.
6-26-2
Moriya H.[9]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Diallo G.
Stebe C.[7]
6-44-67-62
Humbert U.[5]
Habib H.
6-36-3
Mayo A.
Patten H.
6-26-2
Thompson J.[3]
Boulais J.
2-66-47-67
Dougaz A.
Kumar O.
3-66-46-2
R32
Janvier M.
Bangoura S.
7-657-66
Stebe C.[7]
Blanch U.
6-746-36-4
Boulais J.
Chidekh C.
7-656-2
Kirchheimer S.
Saville L.
6-24-66-2
Moriya H.[9]
Mchugh A.
4-66-46-4
Diallo G.
Martin D.
7-56-1
Dougaz A.
Ayeni O.
6-37-61
Markes C.
Clark E.
7-643-66-4
Mejia N.
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Habib H.
Chappell N.
6-16-767-64
Shang J.[6]
Stakusic M.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Vesely J.[2]
4-67-56-4
Patten H.
Seelig K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Draxl L.
7-56-1
Humbert U.[5]
Zhu E.
6-26-0