Henry Patten vs Kyle Seelig — Granby CH Round of 32

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Henry Patten
30 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
USA
Kyle Seelig
#2142ATP
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLW
Patten H.
6-4 6-3
Seelig K.
Patten H.
662
Seelig K.
430

Henry Patten defeated Kyle Seelig 6-4 6-3 in the Granby CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Henry Patten closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Patten H.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Seelig K.

Seelig K.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Patten H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Patten H.Seelig K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
1.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
7.2
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (6 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Patten H.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Seelig K.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Shang J.[6]
7-57-65
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Moriya H.[9]
6-36-4
Shang J.[6]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mayo A.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-4
Shang J.[6]
Thompson J.[3]
7-56-4
Moriya H.[9]
Humbert U.[5]
7-644-67-5
Diallo G.
Dougaz A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
6-16-4
Shang J.[6]
Markes C.
6-26-2
Moriya H.[9]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Diallo G.
Stebe C.[7]
6-44-67-62
Humbert U.[5]
Habib H.
6-36-3
Mayo A.
Patten H.
6-26-2
Thompson J.[3]
Boulais J.
2-66-47-67
Dougaz A.
Kumar O.
3-66-46-2
R32
Janvier M.
Bangoura S.
7-657-66
Stebe C.[7]
Blanch U.
6-746-36-4
Boulais J.
Chidekh C.
7-656-2
Kirchheimer S.
Saville L.
6-24-66-2
Moriya H.[9]
Mchugh A.
4-66-46-4
Diallo G.
Martin D.
7-56-1
Dougaz A.
Ayeni O.
6-37-61
Markes C.
Clark E.
7-643-66-4
Mejia N.
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Habib H.
Chappell N.
6-16-767-64
Shang J.[6]
Stakusic M.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Vesely J.[2]
4-67-56-4
Patten H.
Seelig K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Draxl L.
7-56-1
Humbert U.[5]
Zhu E.
6-26-0