Juncheng Shang vs Colin Markes — Granby CH Round of 16

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
CHN6
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1698Hard ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
USA
Colin Markes
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
Shang J.
6-2 6-2
Markes C.
Shang J.
662
Markes C.
220

Juncheng Shang defeated Colin Markes 6-2 6-2 in the Granby CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shang J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Markes C.

Markes C.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Serve advantage — Shang J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Shang J.Markes C.
34
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Shang J.Markes C.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shang J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Markes C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.7
Surface form
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Shang J.[6]
7-57-65
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Moriya H.[9]
6-36-4
Shang J.[6]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mayo A.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-4
Shang J.[6]
Thompson J.[3]
7-56-4
Moriya H.[9]
Humbert U.[5]
7-644-67-5
Diallo G.
Dougaz A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
6-16-4
Shang J.[6]
Markes C.
6-26-2
Moriya H.[9]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Diallo G.
Stebe C.[7]
6-44-67-62
Humbert U.[5]
Habib H.
6-36-3
Mayo A.
Patten H.
6-26-2
Thompson J.[3]
Boulais J.
2-66-47-67
Dougaz A.
Kumar O.
3-66-46-2
R32
Janvier M.
Bangoura S.
7-657-66
Stebe C.[7]
Blanch U.
6-746-36-4
Boulais J.
Chidekh C.
7-656-2
Kirchheimer S.
Saville L.
6-24-66-2
Moriya H.[9]
Mchugh A.
4-66-46-4
Diallo G.
Martin D.
7-56-1
Dougaz A.
Ayeni O.
6-37-61
Markes C.
Clark E.
7-643-66-4
Mejia N.
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Habib H.
Chappell N.
6-16-767-64
Shang J.[6]
Stakusic M.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Vesely J.[2]
4-67-56-4
Patten H.
Seelig K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Draxl L.
7-56-1
Humbert U.[5]
Zhu E.
6-26-0