Omar Jasika vs Beibit Zhukayev — Nonthaburi 1 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
Jasika O.
4-6 6-3 6-3
Zhukayev B.
Jasika O.
4662
Zhukayev B.
6331

Omar Jasika defeated Beibit Zhukayev 4-6 6-3 6-3 in the Nonthaburi 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jasika O.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Zhukayev B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jasika O.Zhukayev B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
61%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
64%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.2
10.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jasika O.Zhukayev B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
31
Break points saved·Dominant
47
94
Break points won·Clear edge
13
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
13
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jasika O.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Zhukayev B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Hard Elo 1272
Surface ELO
6.3+130 Hard Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1296
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1455
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.5
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Vacherot V.
Ly N.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Ly N.
Sweeny D.
6-46-726-3
Vacherot V.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
6-35-77-66
Quarter-finals
Ly N.
Gray A.[1]
6-47-5
Sweeny D.
Kachmazov A.
4-66-16-2
Vacherot V.
Jacquet K.
6-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[2]
Jasika O.
6-26-4
R16
Vacherot V.
Kuhn N.[7]
7-56-3
Jacquet K.
Yevseyev D.[3]
6-727-643-0
Ly N.
Marchenko I.[8]
4-66-17-5
Jasika O.
Gaio F.
6-07-5
Uchiyama Y.[2]
Hong S.
6-36-3
Sweeny D.
Decamps G.[5]
6-36-4
Gray A.[1]
Donskoy E.
6-34-66-3
Kachmazov A.
Santillan A.
6-26-4
R32
Donskoy E.
Gunneswaran P.
6-36-3
Kuhn N.[7]
Lock B.
7-56-3
Ly N.
Kelly D.
6-47-64
Vacherot V.
Brymer G.
6-16-4
Jacquet K.
Samrej K.
6-24-66-4
Jasika O.
Zhukayev B.
4-66-36-3
Gray A.[1]
Cazaux A.
7-666-4
Uchiyama Y.[2]
Shimizu Y.
6-26-3
Santillan A.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-625-76-0
Marchenko I.[8]
Jung J.
7-616-2
Kachmazov A.
Harris B.[4]
7-6103-66-3
Gaio F.
Oliel Y.[6]
6-23-66-1
Sweeny D.
Charoenphon Y.
6-16-0
Hong S.
Yunchaokete B.
4-66-13-0
Yevseyev D.[3]
Hsu Y.
2-1
Decamps G.[5]
Fomin S.
6-24-3