Ugo Humbert vs Evan Zhu — Granby CH Round of 32

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ugo Humbert
FRA5
Ugo Humbert
#29ATP
1868ELO
1843Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$12MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
USA
Evan Zhu
#699ATP
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWW
Humbert U.
6-2 6-0
Zhu E.
Humbert U.
662
Zhu E.
200

Ugo Humbert defeated Evan Zhu 6-2 6-0 in the Granby CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Ugo Humbert came in ranked #29.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Humbert U.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Zhu E.

Zhu E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Humbert U.

Serve advantage — Humbert U.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Humbert U.Zhu E.
64
Serve
—
15
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Humbert U.Zhu E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.8
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 137). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Humbert U.Zhu E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
11
Break points saved·Dominant
99
31
Break points won·Dominant
37
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
60
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Humbert U.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Zhu E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
7.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Humbert U.Zhu E.
Freshness·Clear edge
96
76

Humbert U.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Zhu E.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 43 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Shang J.[6]
7-57-65
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Moriya H.[9]
6-36-4
Shang J.[6]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mayo A.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-4
Shang J.[6]
Thompson J.[3]
7-56-4
Moriya H.[9]
Humbert U.[5]
7-644-67-5
Diallo G.
Dougaz A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
6-16-4
Shang J.[6]
Markes C.
6-26-2
Moriya H.[9]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Diallo G.
Stebe C.[7]
6-44-67-62
Humbert U.[5]
Habib H.
6-36-3
Mayo A.
Patten H.
6-26-2
Thompson J.[3]
Boulais J.
2-66-47-67
Dougaz A.
Kumar O.
3-66-46-2
R32
Janvier M.
Bangoura S.
7-657-66
Stebe C.[7]
Blanch U.
6-746-36-4
Boulais J.
Chidekh C.
7-656-2
Kirchheimer S.
Saville L.
6-24-66-2
Moriya H.[9]
Mchugh A.
4-66-46-4
Diallo G.
Martin D.
7-56-1
Dougaz A.
Ayeni O.
6-37-61
Markes C.
Clark E.
7-643-66-4
Mejia N.
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Habib H.
Chappell N.
6-16-767-64
Shang J.[6]
Stakusic M.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Vesely J.[2]
4-67-56-4
Patten H.
Seelig K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Draxl L.
7-56-1
Humbert U.[5]
Zhu E.
6-26-0