Nerman Fatic vs Otto Virtanen — Banja Luka CH Round of 16

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
clay
Otto Virtanen
FIN5
Otto Virtanen
#126ATP
1706ELO
1532Clay ELO
$214kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
Fatic N.
6-0 4-6 6-3
Virtanen O.
Fatic N.
6462
Virtanen O.
0631

Nerman Fatic defeated Otto Virtanen 6-0 4-6 6-3 in the Banja Luka CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Otto Virtanen came in ranked #126.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Virtanen O.

Virtanen O.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Virtanen O.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
8.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Virtanen O.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
48
Break points saved·Dominant
63
94
Break points won·Dominant
36
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
85

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Virtanen O.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.1Clay Elo 1478
Surface ELO
5.9+53 Clay Elo edge
2.3Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
7.7Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.3
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fatic N.Virtanen O.
Freshness·
—
80

Virtanen O.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Marozsan F.[2]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Alvarez N.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.[2]
Madaras D.
6-34-66-4
Quarter-finals
Madaras D.
Hassan B.
6-45-76-4
Marozsan F.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-36-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Fatic N.
7-52-1
Alvarez N.
Coppejans K.
6-43-2
R16
Marozsan F.[2]
Durasovic V.
7-56-3
Vatutin A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-0
Madaras D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[4]
7-632-66-4
Hassan B.
Lama G.
6-26-2
Fatic N.
Virtanen O.[5]
6-04-66-3
Coppejans K.
Alvarez Varona N.[1]
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Jianu F.
5-76-17-5
Alvarez N.
Choinski J.
1-66-15-2
R32
Jianu F.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-67-51-0
Alvarez Varona N.[1]
Casanova H.
6-16-736-3
Coppejans K.
Topo M.
7-623-67-66
Marozsan F.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Durasovic V.
Nikles J.
6-06-3
Lama G.
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
6-41-66-3
Virtanen O.[5]
Van Assche L.
6-37-63
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
2-66-36-4
Alvarez N.
Weis A.
4-66-26-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[4]
Setkic A.
6-41-66-3
Choinski J.
Giustino L.[7]
6-27-65
Vatutin A.
Ajdukovic D.
4-66-26-2
Villanueva G.
Basic M.[8]
7-676-2
Madaras D.
Minin M.
6-30-66-4
Dzumhur D.[3]
Bondarenko Y.
6-06-1
Hassan B.
Miedler L.
4-67-696-4