Nerman Fatic vs Ivan Gakhov — Banja Luka CH Round of 32

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#373ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
clay
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#387ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Fatic N.
2-6 6-3 6-4
Gakhov I.
Fatic N.
2662
Gakhov I.
6341

Nerman Fatic defeated Ivan Gakhov 2-6 6-3 6-4 in the Banja Luka CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nerman Fatic came in ranked #373, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Gakhov I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Gakhov I.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Gakhov I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
24
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
63
82
Break points won·Dominant
36
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
59
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Gakhov I.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+94 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1384
5.8Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1430
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Marozsan F.[2]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Alvarez N.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.[2]
Madaras D.
6-34-66-4
Quarter-finals
Madaras D.
Hassan B.
6-45-76-4
Marozsan F.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-36-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Fatic N.
7-52-1
Alvarez N.
Coppejans K.
6-43-2
R16
Marozsan F.[2]
Durasovic V.
7-56-3
Vatutin A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-0
Madaras D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[4]
7-632-66-4
Hassan B.
Lama G.
6-26-2
Fatic N.
Virtanen O.[5]
6-04-66-3
Coppejans K.
Alvarez Varona N.[1]
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Jianu F.
5-76-17-5
Alvarez N.
Choinski J.
1-66-15-2
R32
Jianu F.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-67-51-0
Alvarez Varona N.[1]
Casanova H.
6-16-736-3
Coppejans K.
Topo M.
7-623-67-66
Marozsan F.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Durasovic V.
Nikles J.
6-06-3
Lama G.
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
6-41-66-3
Virtanen O.[5]
Van Assche L.
6-37-63
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
2-66-36-4
Alvarez N.
Weis A.
4-66-26-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[4]
Setkic A.
6-41-66-3
Choinski J.
Giustino L.[7]
6-27-65
Vatutin A.
Ajdukovic D.
4-66-26-2
Villanueva G.
Basic M.[8]
7-676-2
Madaras D.
Minin M.
6-30-66-4
Dzumhur D.[3]
Bondarenko Y.
6-06-1
Hassan B.
Miedler L.
4-67-696-4