Damir Dzumhur vs Nerman Fatic — Banja Luka CH Quarter-final

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Damir Dzumhur
BIH3
Damir Dzumhur
#108ATP
1638ELO
1594Clay ELO
$528kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 22 August 2022
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Dzumhur D.
7-5 2-1
Fatic N.
Dzumhur D.
72–
Fatic N.
51–

Damir Dzumhur advanced when Nerman Fatic retired 7-5 2-1 in the Banja Luka CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Dzumhur D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Dzumhur D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Dzumhur D.Fatic N.
0
Serve
—
53
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Dzumhur D.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dzumhur D.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
63
Break points won·Dominant
64
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Dzumhur D.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Fatic N.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+116 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Clay Elo 1478
6.9Overall Elo 1638
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Dzumhur D.Fatic N.
Freshness·
76
—

Dzumhur D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Marozsan F.[2]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Alvarez N.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.[2]
Madaras D.
6-34-66-4
Quarter-finals
Madaras D.
Hassan B.
6-45-76-4
Marozsan F.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-36-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Fatic N.
7-52-1
Alvarez N.
Coppejans K.
6-43-2
R16
Marozsan F.[2]
Durasovic V.
7-56-3
Vatutin A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-0
Madaras D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[4]
7-632-66-4
Hassan B.
Lama G.
6-26-2
Fatic N.
Virtanen O.[5]
6-04-66-3
Coppejans K.
Alvarez Varona N.[1]
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Jianu F.
5-76-17-5
Alvarez N.
Choinski J.
1-66-15-2
R32
Jianu F.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-67-51-0
Alvarez Varona N.[1]
Casanova H.
6-16-736-3
Coppejans K.
Topo M.
7-623-67-66
Marozsan F.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Durasovic V.
Nikles J.
6-06-3
Lama G.
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
6-41-66-3
Virtanen O.[5]
Van Assche L.
6-37-63
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
2-66-36-4
Alvarez N.
Weis A.
4-66-26-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[4]
Setkic A.
6-41-66-3
Choinski J.
Giustino L.[7]
6-27-65
Vatutin A.
Ajdukovic D.
4-66-26-2
Villanueva G.
Basic M.[8]
7-676-2
Madaras D.
Minin M.
6-30-66-4
Dzumhur D.[3]
Bondarenko Y.
6-06-1
Hassan B.
Miedler L.
4-67-696-4