Jordan Thompson vs Liam Draxl — Granby CH Round of 32

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jordan Thompson
AUS3
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
Liam Draxl
CAN
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Thompson J.
7-5 6-1
Draxl L.
Thompson J.
762
Draxl L.
510

Jordan Thompson defeated Liam Draxl 7-5 6-1 in the Granby CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jordan Thompson came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Draxl L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Draxl L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Draxl L.
Clutch Rating·Even
70
66
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
83
Break points won·Clear edge
24
36
Deciding sets·Even
91
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Draxl L.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+168 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Hard Elo 1565
7.2Overall Elo 1772
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1592
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
2.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
2.5
Minutes 14d
7.8
4.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Thompson J.Draxl L.
Freshness·
—
98

Draxl L.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Shang J.[6]
7-57-65
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Moriya H.[9]
6-36-4
Shang J.[6]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mayo A.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-4
Shang J.[6]
Thompson J.[3]
7-56-4
Moriya H.[9]
Humbert U.[5]
7-644-67-5
Diallo G.
Dougaz A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
6-16-4
Shang J.[6]
Markes C.
6-26-2
Moriya H.[9]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Diallo G.
Stebe C.[7]
6-44-67-62
Humbert U.[5]
Habib H.
6-36-3
Mayo A.
Patten H.
6-26-2
Thompson J.[3]
Boulais J.
2-66-47-67
Dougaz A.
Kumar O.
3-66-46-2
R32
Janvier M.
Bangoura S.
7-657-66
Stebe C.[7]
Blanch U.
6-746-36-4
Boulais J.
Chidekh C.
7-656-2
Kirchheimer S.
Saville L.
6-24-66-2
Moriya H.[9]
Mchugh A.
4-66-46-4
Diallo G.
Martin D.
7-56-1
Dougaz A.
Ayeni O.
6-37-61
Markes C.
Clark E.
7-643-66-4
Mejia N.
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Habib H.
Chappell N.
6-16-767-64
Shang J.[6]
Stakusic M.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Vesely J.[2]
4-67-56-4
Patten H.
Seelig K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Draxl L.
7-56-1
Humbert U.[5]
Zhu E.
6-26-0