Emilio Nava vs Taro Daniel — Winston-Salem Qualifying Round 2

Winston-Salem · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
Emilio Nava
USA7
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
Taro Daniel
JPN3
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
Nava E.
6-4 3-6 7-5
Daniel T.
Nava E.
6372
Daniel T.
4651

Emilio Nava defeated Taro Daniel 6-4 3-6 7-5 in the Winston-Salem qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91. Emilio Nava narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Nava closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-05-08Rome MastersQ1clayEmilio Nava0-6 6-2 6-4
2022-09-19San DiegoR32hardTaro Daniel6-4 6-3
2022-03-07Indian Wells MastersQ1hardTaro Daniel7-5 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Nava E.Daniel T.
39
Serve
—
21
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
52
42
Break points saved·Even
94
93
Break points won·Clear edge
17
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Daniel T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+109 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1512
7.5Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1567
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.1
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
6.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Daniel T.
Freshness·Dominant
96
69

Nava E.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Nava E.[7]
Daniel T.[3]
6-43-67-5
Kubler J.[5]
Fucsovics M.[2]
6-46-0
Huesler M.[4]
Mochizuki S.[8]
6-26-4
Oconnell C.[6]
Griekspoor T.[1]
7-647-64
Q1
Griekspoor T.[1]
Pervolarakis M.
3-66-46-3
Fucsovics M.[2]
Martin A.
6-36-3
Huesler M.[4]
Ebden M.
6-46-3
Oconnell C.[6]
Nava E.
6-26-4
Nava E.[7]
Young D.
6-26-2
Mochizuki S.[8]
Efstathiou M.
6-36-4
Kubler J.[5]
Montes De La Torre I.
7-56-3
Daniel T.[3]
Pecotic M.
6-16-1