Colin Markes vs Ezekiel Clark — Granby CH Round of 32

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Colin Markes
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
USA
Ezekiel Clark
#1280ATP
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWLLW
Markes C.
7-6 3-6 6-4
Clark E.
Markes C.
77362
Clark E.
64641

Colin Markes defeated Ezekiel Clark 7-6 3-6 6-4 in the Granby CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Colin Markes closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Markes C.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Clark E.

Clark E.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Markes C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Markes C.Clark E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
55%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
54%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (31 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Markes C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Clark E.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Shang J.[6]
7-57-65
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Moriya H.[9]
6-36-4
Shang J.[6]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mayo A.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-4
Shang J.[6]
Thompson J.[3]
7-56-4
Moriya H.[9]
Humbert U.[5]
7-644-67-5
Diallo G.
Dougaz A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
6-16-4
Shang J.[6]
Markes C.
6-26-2
Moriya H.[9]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Diallo G.
Stebe C.[7]
6-44-67-62
Humbert U.[5]
Habib H.
6-36-3
Mayo A.
Patten H.
6-26-2
Thompson J.[3]
Boulais J.
2-66-47-67
Dougaz A.
Kumar O.
3-66-46-2
R32
Janvier M.
Bangoura S.
7-657-66
Stebe C.[7]
Blanch U.
6-746-36-4
Boulais J.
Chidekh C.
7-656-2
Kirchheimer S.
Saville L.
6-24-66-2
Moriya H.[9]
Mchugh A.
4-66-46-4
Diallo G.
Martin D.
7-56-1
Dougaz A.
Ayeni O.
6-37-61
Markes C.
Clark E.
7-643-66-4
Mejia N.
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Habib H.
Chappell N.
6-16-767-64
Shang J.[6]
Stakusic M.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Vesely J.[2]
4-67-56-4
Patten H.
Seelig K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Draxl L.
7-56-1
Humbert U.[5]
Zhu E.
6-26-0