Hady Habib vs Nick Chappell — Granby CH Round of 32

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LIB
Hady Habib
#650ATP
1412ELO
1364Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Habib H.
6-1 6-7 7-6
Chappell N.
Habib H.
666772
Chappell N.
178641

Hady Habib defeated Nick Chappell 6-1 6-7 7-6 in the Granby CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Hady Habib came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Habib H.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Habib H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Habib H.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Habib H.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
44
0
Break points saved·Dominant
92
29
Break points won·Slight edge
1
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Habib H.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
4.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
6.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Diallo G.
Shang J.[6]
7-57-65
Semi-finals
Diallo G.
Moriya H.[9]
6-36-4
Shang J.[6]
Mayo A.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Mayo A.
Mejia N.
6-43-66-4
Shang J.[6]
Thompson J.[3]
7-56-4
Moriya H.[9]
Humbert U.[5]
7-644-67-5
Diallo G.
Dougaz A.
3-66-37-65
R16
Mejia N.
Janvier M.
6-16-4
Shang J.[6]
Markes C.
6-26-2
Moriya H.[9]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Diallo G.
Stebe C.[7]
6-44-67-62
Humbert U.[5]
Habib H.
6-36-3
Mayo A.
Patten H.
6-26-2
Thompson J.[3]
Boulais J.
2-66-47-67
Dougaz A.
Kumar O.
3-66-46-2
R32
Janvier M.
Bangoura S.
7-657-66
Stebe C.[7]
Blanch U.
6-746-36-4
Boulais J.
Chidekh C.
7-656-2
Kirchheimer S.
Saville L.
6-24-66-2
Moriya H.[9]
Mchugh A.
4-66-46-4
Diallo G.
Martin D.
7-56-1
Dougaz A.
Ayeni O.
6-37-61
Markes C.
Clark E.
7-643-66-4
Mejia N.
Aguilar J.
6-26-3
Habib H.
Chappell N.
6-16-767-64
Shang J.[6]
Stakusic M.
6-46-4
Mayo A.
Vesely J.[2]
4-67-56-4
Patten H.
Seelig K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Draxl L.
7-56-1
Humbert U.[5]
Zhu E.
6-26-0