Nicolas Alvarez vs Alexander Weis — Banja Luka CH Round of 32

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
PER
Nicolas Alvarez
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 August 2022
clay
ITA
Alexander Weis
#620ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
Alvarez N.
4-6 6-2 6-0
Weis A.
Alvarez N.
4662
Weis A.
6201

Nicolas Alvarez defeated Alexander Weis 4-6 6-2 6-0 in the Banja Luka CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nicolas Alvarez came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Alvarez N.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Weis A.

Weis A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Alvarez N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Alvarez N.Weis A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Even
3.2
2.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (45 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Alvarez N.Weis A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
19
4
Break points saved·Clear edge
38
50
Break points won·Even
12
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
38
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Alvarez N.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Weis A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
5.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Marozsan F.[2]
Dzumhur D.[3]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[3]
Alvarez N.
6-36-2
Marozsan F.[2]
Madaras D.
6-34-66-4
Quarter-finals
Madaras D.
Hassan B.
6-45-76-4
Marozsan F.[2]
Vatutin A.
6-36-2
Dzumhur D.[3]
Fatic N.
7-52-1
Alvarez N.
Coppejans K.
6-43-2
R16
Marozsan F.[2]
Durasovic V.
7-56-3
Vatutin A.
Villanueva G.
6-46-0
Madaras D.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[4]
7-632-66-4
Hassan B.
Lama G.
6-26-2
Fatic N.
Virtanen O.[5]
6-04-66-3
Coppejans K.
Alvarez Varona N.[1]
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Jianu F.
5-76-17-5
Alvarez N.
Choinski J.
1-66-15-2
R32
Jianu F.
Seyboth Wild T.
4-67-51-0
Alvarez Varona N.[1]
Casanova H.
6-16-736-3
Coppejans K.
Topo M.
7-623-67-66
Marozsan F.[2]
Fanselow S.
6-46-3
Durasovic V.
Nikles J.
6-06-3
Lama G.
Ferreira Silva F.[6]
6-41-66-3
Virtanen O.[5]
Van Assche L.
6-37-63
Fatic N.
Gakhov I.
2-66-36-4
Alvarez N.
Weis A.
4-66-26-0
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[4]
Setkic A.
6-41-66-3
Choinski J.
Giustino L.[7]
6-27-65
Vatutin A.
Ajdukovic D.
4-66-26-2
Villanueva G.
Basic M.[8]
7-676-2
Madaras D.
Minin M.
6-30-66-4
Dzumhur D.[3]
Bondarenko Y.
6-06-1
Hassan B.
Miedler L.
4-67-696-4